WSRW asks USTDA how its Western Sahara policy will be followed

In 2005, USTDA stated that it "has not and would not support any activities in Western Sahara”. On 4 June 2009, Western Sahara Resource Watch and the US based Defense Forum Foundation sent a letter to the agency asking how this policy will be followed, considering the grants which are now being given to infrastructure projects for Morocccan fisheries. WSRW points to the fact that most of the Moroccan fisheries is taking place in Western Sahara.
Published: 11.06 - 2009 15:10Printer version    
United States Trade and Development Agency
Att: Mr. Carl B. Cress,
Director, Middle East and North Africa Region
1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1600
Arlington, VA 22209

Chargé d’Affaires, Mr. Robert P. Jackson
Embassy of the United States of America
2 Avenue de Mohamed El Fassi

Melbourne/Washington, 4 June 2009

Regarding USTDA policy and practice on Western Sahara

Dear Sirs,

Western Sahara Resource Watch, an organisation spanning 30 countries, working in solidarity with the Sahrawi people, and Defense Forum Foundation/US-Western Sahara Foundation, have noticed with interest the USTDA media release published 5 May 2009, regarding grants for cold chain infrastructure for the Moroccan fisheries sector. Based on the good USTDA policy on Western Sahara, we have a question as to how the grants will be implemented.

As correctly pointed out in the media release, products from the fisheries sector account for a large part of Morocco’s national exports. As USTDA is probably well aware, most of this industry is taking place in Western Sahara, which Morocco annexed and occupied in 1975. A large part of the industry is thus tangled up in a series of political, ethical and legal dilemmas.

The US Government does not recognise Moroccan claims to Western Sahara, as clearly was expressed when the previous US Trade Representative Mr. Zoellick in 2004 specifically pointed out that the US-Moroccan Free Trade Agreement only applies to Morocco as it is internationally recognised, and not Western Sahara.

Also the USTDA has been clear that it does not wish to support projects in Western Sahara.

In correspondence in October 2005 between a country manager of USTDA and a member of staff of the US House of Representatives, the USTDA official confirmed that “USTDA has not and would not support any activities in Western Sahara”.

This position was expressed when USTDA had announced its support for a GIS project for the Moroccan oil company formally known as ONHYM. Both in the media and in external correspondence USTDA then stated clearly that it would to follow the policy of the US Government supporting the UN peace process, and “because of this” would not support activities in Western Sahara.

The following was stated by a USTDA country manager on 26 October 2005 to a House staff member:

“ONHYM uses an internationally recognized map of Morocco that excludes Western Sahara.
ONHYM does NOT consider Western Sahara part of Morocco's territory. Additionally, the GIS modeling system is based on the internationally recognized map of Morocco which excludes Western Sahara. Therefore, this equipment cannot be used in Western Sahara because it is not recognized in the modeling equipment and is not included within the boundaries that will be examined with this GIS equipment.  The Government of Morocco has never requested funds from USTDA to conduct activities in Western Sahara.  We would not support any activities in Western Sahara. USTDA is guided by US foreign policy as it is developed by the Department of State in delivering our program. According to the Desk Officer for Morocco the US Government is working for a solution to Western Sahara through the UN context.  All parties involved need to work through the UN to find a mutually agreed upon solution.  Because of this, USTDA has not and would not support any activities in Western Sahara“.

As you perhaps also know, this USTDA policy on Western Sahara was confirmed to the news service on 19 December 2005. “USTDA does not provide support to any projects that will take place in or affect [the territory known as Western Sahara]”, a senior USTDA representative stated. It was also said that “the maps used for the project stop at the internationally-recognised borders of Morocco, this being something the Moroccans agreed to when the project was first negotiated four years ago.”

Most of the fisheries industry taking place in Western Sahara today is carried out to the south of this internationally recognised border, and almost all of the people employed are Moroccans who have settled in Western Sahara since Morocco illegally annexed the territory in 1975. Representatives of the Sahrawi people have declared on many occasions that the fisheries industry is taking place in disregard of the wishes and interests of their people.

The Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination, as established by more than 100 UN resolutions, includes, inter alia, the right of permanent sovereignty over its natural resources. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources is a customary principle of international law.

For an analysis on the legality of this industry, we would like to refer you to a statement from Mr. Hans Corell, former UN Legal Counsel and UN Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, presented at the University of Pretoria, 5 December 2008:, and to his letter to the UN Security Council on 29 January 2002:

In addition to its legal implications, supporting infrastructure projects in Western Sahara has clear political and ethical ramifications, as has been pointed out by several governments, and undermines the UN peace process.

WSRW has not seen any notice from USTDA that its policy has been changed on the Western Sahara conflict, and expects it to be following the good policy which was stated in 2005.

On this basis Western Sahara Resource Watch wishes to ask the USTDA the following question:

What measures is USTDA taking to make sure that the cold chain infrastructure projects that it will support are located in Morocco as it is internationally recognised, and not in Western Sahara?

We look forward to your reply,

Yours sincerely,

Cate Lewis
International Secretary
Western Sahara Resource Watch

Suzanne Scholte
President, Defense Forum Foundation
And chairwoman of US-Western Sahara Foundation


23.02 - 2018 / 23.02 - 2018SA Court confirms: Morocco has no ownership over Saharawi phoshates
23.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018EU Member States disagree over toxic fertilizers
21.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018Vigeo Eiris goes back on false claim
20.02 - 2018 / 20.02 - 2018EU Parliamentarians concerned over Commission's respect of rule of law
15.02 - 2018 / 15.02 - 2018Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
08.02 - 2018 / 08.02 - 2018Studies continue on Kosmos Energy's block
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Kosmos and Cairn have pulled out of Western Sahara
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Why WSRW refuses to take part in the EU's Western Sahara consultation
03.02 - 2018 / 03.02 - 2018Unison condemnation of the EU Commission from Western Sahara groups
02.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018Siemens fails to respond Western Sahara question at AGM
01.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018EU has sealed Western Sahara trade deal in violation of Court Judgment
31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Polisario threatens compensation from EU and companies, warns Nutrien
31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Vigeo Eiris reports untruly about UN human rights approval
29.01 - 2018 / 29.01 - 2018'Biggest importer' of phosphate rock is pulling out
27.01 - 2018 / 27.01 - 2018Senior socialist MEPs publicly slam EU-Morocco talks
23.01 - 2018 / 12.01 - 2018Glencore has left occupied Western Sahara
22.01 - 2018 / 22.01 - 2018German government not supportive of business in Western Sahara
15.01 - 2018 / 15.01 - 2018Denmark accepts continued EU fisheries in occupied waters
10.01 - 2018 / 10.01 - 2018EU Court advocate: Fish agreement invalid for including Western Sahara
08.01 - 2018 / 08.01 - 2018EU Commission eying new fish deal including Western Sahara


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.
The Western Sahara oil curse


Big oil’s interest in occupied Western Sahara has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Some companies are now drilling, in complete disregard of international law and the Saharawi people’s rights. Here’s what you need to know. News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy