Sounds Alarm about Environmental Projects on Occupied Land
Several Moroccan environmental projects in occupied Western Sahara are being considered by the UN. Published in Norwegian news service Bistandsaktuelt, 17 July 2012.
Published: 25.07 - 2012 09:39Printer version    
Story below was published 17 July in the Norwegian newspaper Bistandsaktuelt, a foreign affairs and foreign aid journal owned by the Norwegian government agency for development aid.

Translated by Western Sahara Resource Watch

Sounds Alarm about Environmental Projects on Occupied Land

Several Moroccan environmental projects in occupied Western Sahara are being considered by the UN.

“The UN has, through a series of resolutions, denounced the occupation of Western Sahara and is involved in the arbitration between Morocco and Sahrawi representatives. It would therefore be problematic if a UN organ were to approve Moroccan companies’ activity in the occupied areas,” Erik Hagen, director of the Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara, explained to Bistandsaktuelt.  

Controversial
The German corporation Siemens announced at the beginning of 2012 that they would concentrate on wind power in “Morocco”.

By means of the windmill parks Haouma and Foum El Oued, the company would contribute to Morocco’s goal that a fifth of the country’s energy supply would be renewable. Siemens therefore applied to have the wind parks approved as projects in “the Clean Development Mechanism” (CDM). The windmill parks are being built in cooperation with Nareva, a company in which the Moroccan king owns shares.

There is only one catch in this. Foum El Oued is not located in Morocco at all but a little distance outside Laayoune in Morocco-occupied Western Sahara. In a letter to The Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara [1] the company claims that the energy will benefit the local population, but it is uncertain whether and how the Sahrawi population has been consulted about the project.

In the CDM, companies may receive emission credits for projects involving renewable energy in developing countries. These credits may subsequently be sold. To be approved, the project must first be evaluated by a company certified to evaluate CDM projects.

Siemens has, however, met resistance on its path through the system. Det Norske Veritas (DNV) was responsible for approving the Foum El Oued project but turned thumbs down. The reason was that the project is taking place in a politically controversial area.

Thumbs Down
Stein B. Jensen at DNV Climate Change Services recounts that they originally believed that the wind park was to be built in southern Morocco, but after a while began to suspect that this was not the case.

“When we visited the project, it became clear that our suspicions were justified. It was therefore fairly simple on our part. In January we disclosed that we would be negative to the project. When a customer is informed of this, they can choose whether to continue with the negative recommendation or cancel the project. In this case they chose to cancel, as most do,” Jensen related.

The project was officially cancelled in April 2012. In CDM’s project data base Foum El Oued is still listed. Jensen explained this on the basis of slowness in updating the UN’s web pages.

Bistandsaktuelt has not succeeded in obtaining an answer from the CDM secretariat.

Siemens: Not Violating Any Rights
Alfons Benzinger, spokesperson for Siemens, emphasised that the company has a minor part in the Foum El Oued project.

”It is not Siemens who is developing this project. We would just deliver and maintain 22 wind turbines for our customer, Nareva,” Benzinger wrote in an e-mail to Bistandsaktuelt.

He believes the project entails a series of “very positive effects” in the form of sustainable wind power, development “the region” Western Sahara and improvement of the local population’s situation.

“It is not Siemens that decided where the project is to be located. By delivering the technology for this project, we are making a political statement about this region’s status. Independent of political conflicts, we believe that a functioning infrastructure will improve the economic conditions – and thus also the situation for the people of Western Sahara,” Siemens’s spokesperson stated.

Simultaneously, the company has made a legal assessment and concluded that its participation in the project “may be permitted under the laws and regulations in force and does not violate the right to self-determination or any other human right within international law,” Benzinger wrote.

Several Up for Assessment

Siemens’s wind power project is, however, not the only environmental project planned on occupied land. The Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara and the network Sahara Resource Watch have found that the Moroccan branch of CDM is trying to certify several “green projects” in occupied Western Sahara:

  • A solar energy project for the fishery industry.
  • A project for wind power for the cement production run by the Italian-owned Ciments du Maroc.
  • A project for phosphate extraction by the Moroccan state-owned company OCP. Several investors, including the Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global, have previously withdrawn from this company for ethical reasons, based precisely on the UN’s evaluation of international law in industrial activity in the territory.

    “We urge CDM to follow the advice of the UN’s lawyers and not permit financing of projects in Western Sahara,” Sara Eyckmans, coordinator for Western Sahara Resource Watch stated.  

    Erik Hagen of The Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara is uncertain whether the consultancy firms that have to approve the projects have sufficient understanding of what is happening in Western Sahara and believes the question must be clarified principally by CDM.

    “Siemens turns out not to be a unique case. We appreciate to learn about DNV’s attitude and this will hopefully set the standard for future CDM applications in the occupied territories. But we can not take it for granted that all certification companies will reach the same conclusion. CDM must in principle clarify that a state can not have CDM projects in areas that lie outside their internationally accepted borders,” Hagen stated.  

    Note from translator:
    [1] Correct should be: “letter to Western Sahara Resource Watch”

  •     
    News:

    15.02 - 2018 / 15.02 - 2018Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
    08.02 - 2018 / 08.02 - 2018Studies continue on Kosmos Energy's block
    07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Kosmos and Cairn have pulled out of Western Sahara
    07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Why WSRW refuses to take part in the EU's Western Sahara consultation
    03.02 - 2018 / 03.02 - 2018Unison condemnation of the EU Commission from Western Sahara groups
    02.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018Siemens fails to respond Western Sahara question at AGM
    01.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018EU has sealed Western Sahara trade deal in violation of Court Judgment
    31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Polisario threatens compensation from EU and companies, warns Nutrien
    31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Vigeo Eiris reports untruly about UN human rights approval
    29.01 - 2018 / 29.01 - 2018'Biggest importer' of phosphate rock is pulling out
    27.01 - 2018 / 27.01 - 2018Senior socialist MEPs publicly slam EU-Morocco talks
    23.01 - 2018 / 12.01 - 2018Glencore has left occupied Western Sahara
    22.01 - 2018 / 22.01 - 2018German government not supportive of business in Western Sahara
    15.01 - 2018 / 15.01 - 2018Denmark accepts continued EU fisheries in occupied waters
    10.01 - 2018 / 10.01 - 2018EU Court advocate: Fish agreement invalid for including Western Sahara
    08.01 - 2018 / 08.01 - 2018EU Commission eying new fish deal including Western Sahara
    07.01 - 2018 / 07.01 - 2018Nutrien: The new giant on conflict minerals
    20.12 - 2017 / 12.12 - 2017EU Commission visited occupied Western Sahara to authorize exporters
    07.12 - 2017 / 07.12 - 2017Siemens: the Moroccan king's wind turbine supplier in Western Sahara
    05.12 - 2017 / 13.11 - 2017EU fish support to Morocco builds Western Sahara fish industry




    EN ES FR DE AR

    Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
    Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!

    tn_court_photo_gdeim_izik_610.jpg

    Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
    Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

    tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

    Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
    Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder

    tn_poweringplunder_eng_610.jpg

    At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.
    The Western Sahara oil curse

    tn_san_leon_protest_camps_8_august_2015_610x200.jpg

    Big oil’s interest in occupied Western Sahara has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Some companies are now drilling, in complete disregard of international law and the Saharawi people’s rights. Here’s what you need to know.

    WSRW.org News Archive 2017
    WSRW.org News Archive 2016
    WSRW.org News Archive 2015
    WSRW.org News Archive 2014
    WSRW.org News Archive 2013
    WSRW.org News Archive 2012
    WSRW.org News Archive 2011
    WSRW.org News Archive 2010
    WSRW.org News Archive 2009
    WSRW.org News Archive 2008
    WSRW.org News Archive 2007
    WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


    Register for our English newsletter:









    These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy