Siemens dodges questions on Saharawi consent
Why does Siemens not seek the consent of the Saharawis to operate on their land? At the company's Annual Shareholders Meeting, the company failed to answer.
Published: 13.02 - 2017 16:27Printer version    
Western Sahara Resource Watch was present at the Annual Shareholders Meeting of Siemens, in Munich, 1 February 2017.

WSRW asked whether Siemens had bothered to seek the consent of the Saharawi people. The CEO of the company, Joe Kaeser, did not respond the question. Find below the comment from the Siemens CEO in German (with our translation into English), together with the statement by Western Sahara Resource Watch given at the meeting.

CEO Joe Kaeser:
Uns ist das Thema und der umstrittene Status der Westsahara bekannt und wir gehen damit auch sehr sensibel um was die Rechtmässigkeit der Aktivitäten angeht. Wir haben das sehr sehr intensiv geprüft. (00:15) Wir haben den Rat von anerkannten Experten und unabhängigen Rechtsberatern eingeholt. Wir sind der Auffassung auf der Basis dieser Erkundungen, die wie gesagt sehr intensiv waren, dass wir nach anwendbarem Recht hier zulässig diese Projekte auch machen.
(00:34) Wir sind natürlich auch der Auffassung, dass das Recht auf Selbstbestimmung der Völker natürlich gilt und dass das Völkerrecht gilt. Allerdings, wie gesagt, wir haben das geprüft.
(00:43) Wir unterstützen auch die Position der deutschen Bundesregierung, die die Hoffnung geäussert hat, dass man hier eine friedliche und insbesondere auch einvernehmliche Lösung der ausstehenden Fragen im Bezug auf die Westsahara und deren Unterstützung durch die Vereinten Nationen hat. Wir begrüssen das ausdrücklich.
(01:03) Ich meine, schauen Sie, wenn wir dort Windparks errichten, erneuerbare Energie, am effizientesten überhaupt auf der ganzen Welt erzeugen, mit etwa drei Cent pro Kilowattstunde, das ist Weltklasse, (01:20) dann hat ja eigentlich jeder was davon und es wäre schade, wenn man sich dort nicht durchringen könnte, dass die Menschen auf allen Gebieten dieses Landes davon profitieren.
-------------------------
The issue of Western Sahara and its disputed status is well-known to us and we handle the legality of the activities in it in a sensible manner. We examined this very very in-depth.
(00:15) We obtained advice from recognized experts and independent legal advisors. On the basis of these inquiries – which were, as I told, very intensive – our opinion is that we carry out these projects in accordance with the applicable law.
(00:34) Of course our opinion is also that the right to self-determination of people is valid, that international law applies. However, as already told, we verified this.
(00:43) We also support the position of the German Federal Government who expressed the hope to come to a peaceful and in particular mutual solution concerning the open questions regarding the Western Sahara and its support for the United Nations. We explicitly welcome this.
(01:03) I mean, look, if we build wind parks there, renewable energy, the most efficient ones in the whole world, about 3 cents per kilowatt, this is world class,
(01:20) then actually everybody benefits from this and it would be a pity if one finally doesn’t manage to make it profitable for people in every area of this country.


The speech below was given by Western Sahara Resource Watch:
For four decades, Morocco has kept the territory of Western Sahara under foreign occupation.
No state in the world recognises Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara. The UN has condemned Morocco’s invasion. The International Court of Justice has declared that Morocco has no rights to that land.
Half the people of the territory has fled after the occupation. More than one hundred UN resolutions are calling for the right to self-determination for the people of Western Sahara.
Siemens seems to not bother about the rights of the people of Western Sahara. Siemens signs agreements for construction of windmills in Western Sahara with the wrong government – that of Morocco. Its business partner is owned by the royal family in Morocco.
Our association has on numerous occasions asked Siemens what it has done to seek the consent of the people of Western Sahara - when operating on their land.
Siemens has never responded to that question. Siemens maintains that it is contributing to the development of the territory. But that does not respond the question we are asking - nor the question that the Saharawi people and refugees ask.
Siemens windmills supply today 95 % of the energy required for the Moroccan government to operate its mining industry in Western Sahara, an industry widely blacklisted by international investors for violating basic ethics. The secretary-general of the local Saharawi association for the protection of natural resources in Western Sahara is serving a lifetime in a Moroccan jail for protesting this plunder. Siemens is today morally, financially, politically, supporting the Moroccan occupation. On its website, Siemens even labels Western Sahara as part of Morocco.
The Court of Justice of the EU last year dealt with the question of EU operations in Western Sahara. The judgement from December is crystal clear. Western Sahara is fundamentally distinct and separate from Morocco. Morocco has no right to enter into deals in Western Sahara without hearing the opinion of the representative body of the people of Western Sahara. Based on that judgement, there is no other way to describe agreements with the government of Morocco in Western Sahara as “illegal”.
It is hard to underline this clear enough. Siemens is running a real financial risk. These agreements with the Moroccan government are null and void. Worthless. …Signed with the wrong government…. We urge all of you here today to study the judgement of the EU Court of Justice. Without seeking consent of the representative body of Western Sahara, a company violates basic principles of law.
This is a matter of human rights and basic due diligence. It is not enough of Siemens to SAY that it supports human rights. It has to show this in practice. In Western Sahara, this means that the people have the right to decide over their own land.
We have two questions to the management of Siemens:
First, why does Siemens refuse to seek the consent of the people of Western Sahara?
Second, since Siemens refuses to seek the consent of the people of the territory: how does Siemens now address the risk of legal sanctions from the representative body of the people of Western Sahara?



    

Top
News:

24.03 - 2017 / 24.03 - 2017Morocco's P for Politics in Africa
23.03 - 2017 / 07.03 - 2017Kosmos with extensive seismic studies off occupied Western Sahara
23.03 - 2017 / 23.03 - 2017African Union asks Morocco to not sign Western Sahara deals
20.03 - 2017 / 20.03 - 2017French government dilutes Court of Justice conclusion
17.03 - 2017 / 17.03 - 2017Spain confirms: EU-Morocco trade deal not for Western Sahara goods
17.03 - 2017 / 02.03 - 2017New controversial energy infrastructure to be built in Western Sahara
16.03 - 2017 / 16.03 - 2017New publication on the EU and Western Sahara
10.03 - 2017 / 08.03 - 2017Morocco lobbies for toxic metals in EU agriculture
08.03 - 2017 / 05.03 - 2017Basque parliament asks companies to stay clear from Western Sahara
03.03 - 2017 / 02.03 - 2017The Vigeo Eiris shock: from ethics to occupation
15.02 - 2017 / 15.02 - 2017Glencore steps up oil search offshore occupied Western Sahara
13.02 - 2017 / 12.02 - 2017Siemens dodges questions on Saharawi consent
10.02 - 2017 / 09.02 - 2017This cargo from occupied Western Sahara is now to arrive France
09.02 - 2017 / 09.02 - 2017Danish company stops salt imports from Western Sahara
02.02 - 2017 / 02.02 - 2017EU looks to avoid energy imports from Western Sahara
25.01 - 2017 / 25.01 - 2017Key Bay unloaded all cargo in Fécamp, France
24.01 - 2017 / 24.01 - 2017Here is the Key Bay inside the port of Fécamp
23.01 - 2017 / 23.01 - 2017Why the Key Bay imports are not in accordance with EU law
22.01 - 2017 / 22.01 - 2017Key Bay just outside of port of Fécamp
18.01 - 2017 / 18.01 - 2017Key Bay to arrive in France while complaints to be filed




EN ES FR DE AR

Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
Report: COP22 controversy - Moroccan green energy used for plunder

tn_poweringplunder_eng_610.jpg

At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
The Western Sahara oil curse

tn_san_leon_protest_camps_8_august_2015_610x200.jpg

Big oil’s interest in occupied Western Sahara has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Some companies are now drilling, in complete disregard of international law and the Saharawi people’s rights. Here’s what you need to know.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!

tn_court_photo_gdeim_izik_610.jpg

On 17 February 2013, in a mockery of justice, a Moroccan military court condemned 25 Saharawi citizens to shockingly tough prison sentences. Help us to release the Gdeim Izik 25.

WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


Register for our English newsletter:









These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy