The Lithuanian firm Lifosa refused to answer the question whether they intend to terminate phosphate imports from Western Sahara, and was today kicked out of the UN Global Compact initiative on Corporate Social Responsibility.
The Lithuanian phosphate importer Lifosa last year admitted to WSRW to have carried out large scale phosphate imports from Western Sahara.
The imports have never appeared in their Corporate Social Responsibility reports, even though the firm already in 2005 signed up as a member of UN Global Compact - a UN initiative for companies that adhere to basic principles of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption.
“Has Lifosa on any occasion, since the first imports were made, ever consulted representatives of the Saharawis to investigate whether the imports are to the wishes or interests of the Saharawis?”, WSRW asked the company in a letter 6 September 2010.
Lifosa denied in the same letter to having a long-term agreement with OCP, but stated they sign quarterly supply agreements. They admitted to having received 250.000 tonnes of phosphate rock in 2008, 120.000 tonnes in 2009 and 465.000 tonnes in 2010 - all of it from Western Sahara.
On 1 December 2010, WSRW sent a new letter to Lifosa, asking whether Lifosa and their mother firm Eurochem will "follow the example of other ethically oriented fertilizer producers internationally and terminate its imports of phosphate from Western Sahara".
After 6 months of not responding, Global Compact appears now to have proceeded to delist the company from their list of participants. The delist was done today, 3 June 2011. Images below show the list of participants before and after Lifosa appeared as a member to the initiative.
Global Compact expects participating companies to respond to concerns from civil society.
AB Lifosa is the largest producer of phosphate mineral fertilizers in the Baltic states and an industry leader in the European Union, and a subsidiary of the Russian firm Eurochem.
Global Compact webpages 7 May 2011, showing AB Lifosa as a participant:
Global Compact webpages 3 June 2011, showing AB Lifosa delisted from the initiative:
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.