The most heavily involved foreign firm in occupied Western Sahara, US-Canadian fertiliser company PotashCorp, has published a statement on its trade and on how it interprets the Western Sahara conflict. Read their erroneous text, and WSRW’s comments.
The US-Canadian fertiliser company PotashCorp (PCS), which imports phosphate rock from a Moroccan state owned firm in occupied Western Sahara, refuses to terminate its controversial and unethical purchases.
In a statement issued by the firm in April, PotashCorp even tries to give explanations as to why Western Sahara should remain under Moroccan control. They label Western Sahara as “Moroccan”, and claim that the Moroccan government has a “stabilizing influence” in the territory it illegally annexed.
The statement contains also a number of erroneous claims on international law and the US government position.
“Not only is PotashCorp today the most important financial contributor to the Moroccan occupation in Western Sahara through its massive and continuous purchases. With this new statement, PotashCorp is now also the boldest defender of the brutal occupation”, stated Sara Eyckmans of Western Sahara Resource Watch.
“We encourage PotashCorp to reconsider your public statement concerning the UN Legal Opinion of 2002, the US government position, the terminology of the territory ‘Moroccan Sahara’, and the assumption that Morocco has a stabilizing function in the territory it has illegally annexed”, stated the letter, pointing to all the errors and misinterpretations of the firm’s analysis.
Now, five weeks later, PotashCorp's unfortunate statements remain on their webages – including the firm's gravely erroneous and highly political comments regarding the conflict.
PotashCorp, and its predecessor firm, Arcadian, has been the biggest importer of phosphate rock from Western Sahara since at least 1987. Several European investors have divested from the company due to its unethical business practice in Western Sahara.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.