Photo above shows the Norwegian flagged vessel 'Rosita' visiting the phosphate dock of Western Sahara, waiting to be loaded. The vessel is right now waiting to be loaded with phosphate rock.
In order to prevent similar episodes in the future, the shipping company will introduce a provision in its contracts that prevents its vessels from doing similar assignments. The story below appeared on 14 April 2015 in the Norwegian business daily Dagens Næringsliv.
Translated to English by Western Sahara Resource Watch.
An unfortunate mistake A vessel from Ugland is to ship phosphates from Western Sahara. An unfortunate mistake, according to the shipping company. The dry bulk carrier «Rosita», a 52.000 tonne vessel owned by the Ugland shipping company in Grimstad, is awaiting to be loaded with cargo in ocupied Western Sahara. It will never happen again, CEO Øystein Beisland assures. He says the vessel was rented out on a time charterparty contract with a duration between four and six months. «The vessel was available in Morocco when we signed the agreement. It is the charterer who is in control over ‘Rosita’ in the period it is rented, and we were not aware of the fact that the vessel was directed to Western Sahara». «An unfortunate mistake has taken place from our side», Beisland said. Friday, the shipping company was in contact with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Norwegian Shipowners Association over the situation. For the future, Ugland will assure to install a provision in the shipping contracts preventing the arrival of the shipping company’s vessels to Western Sahara. The phosphate exports from Western Sahara is Morocco’s largest income from the occupied territories. Erik Hagen, director of the Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara is praising Ugland for having acted so quickly when they were made aware of the affair. «It is commendable that the company now goes through this issue so thoroughly. Ugland’s reaction sets an example for other Norwegian shipping companies, and shows it is possible to act responsibly, even in those cases where there are no clear international sanctions», Hagen told «Regretfully, the occupation of Western Sahara is not very much known among the Norwegian population and in business circles. Therefore it is understandable that mistakes can happen, particularly for shipping companies with vessels visiting harbours all over the world.» In 2007, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged Norwegian companies to not trade or invest in Western Sahara in violation of the interests of the local people.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.