Coop's spokesperson Ramon Gander stated to Swiss media that the supermarket chain will stop purchasing Western Sahara tomatoes for environmental reasons; tomato production in Western Sahara depletes the fossil aquifers - the non-renewable underground water supplies in the desert area. Accordingly, Coop will import its cherry tomatoes from Spain and northern Morocco from 2017 onwards.
The revelation was made to Swiss national media, in the prime time consumer program Kassensturz. The program can be viewed here (in German).
Coop's reason for ending the import thus differs from Coop Sweden and Coop Norway, which have both stopped selling tomatoes from Western Sahara in 2009 over legal concerns.
Two other Swiss retailers, Migros and Denner, are reportedly also reviewing their practices.
Martina Bosshard, spokesperson for Migros, said that they are looking into the situation, but they will not boycott products from Western Sahara. Seasonal imports of melons grown in Western Sahara are planned to go ahead. Migros does take the criticism seriously, Bosshard stated. The origin of the products labeled as from Morocco is reviewed on a regular basis. If these products are in fact from Western Sahara, Migros will leave the choice to the consumers by indicating the true origin of the products on the shop reference tags.
Denner has vine tomatoes and melons from Western Sahara on offer for short periods, said spokesperson Thomas Kaderli. He claims it is not possible to change the shop label, as the products do not originate in a recognised State.
Though their approach to products from Western Sahara differs, Coop, Migros and Denner do share a policy on products from Israeli settlements on Palestinian land. All three indicate the controversial origin on the reference tags in their shops, by stating the products come from Israeli settlement areas.
WSRW has followed the tomato exports from Western Sahara for years. In 2012, WSRW published the report Label and Liability, documenting how agricultural produce from Western Sahara ends up in European supermarkets, labelled as from Morocco.
Ever since its invasion in 1975, Morocco has occupied a large part of Western Sahara. The United Nations consider the territory to be Non-Self Governing, and have not accorded Morocco an administering mandate. The indigenous Saharawi people have a universally accepted right to self-determination, the right to decide the future status of their land. Consequently, Morocco cannot undertake economic activities in the territory without the explicit free, prior informed consent of the Saharawis. But Morocco does precisely the opposite; while not allowing a referendum to take place, it continues to sell off Western Sahara's resources as if it is entitled to. However, it is not.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.