Felled by Trade with Western Sahara. President resigns.
Paul-Christian Rieber, president of the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO), has for years traded with a country that Norwegian authorities have asked the business community to avoid. That may have been the main reason he resigned yesterday. Aftenposten, 24 April 2010.
Published: 27.04 - 2010 19:19Printer version    
Story below appeared in Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten, 24 April 2010.
Translation by Western Sahara Resource Watch

Felled by Trade with Western Sahara. President resigns.

Paul-Christian Rieber, president of the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO), has for years traded with a country that Norwegian authorities have asked the business community to avoid. That may have been the main reason he resigned yesterday. Aftenposten, 24 April 2010.

By Siri Gedde-Dahl
24 April 2010
Read original here (in Norwegian)

A little past 8 o’clock on Saturday morning NHO’s vice-president, Kristin Skogen Lund, received a message from NHO President Paul-Christian Rieber to the effect that he was resigning from office with immediate effect. As Skogen Lund received the press in a steady stream throughout the afternoon, the new NHO president asserted that Rieber’s resignation came as a complete surprise to her.

Rieber stated that “consideration for NHO” was the reason for his resignation.

“He has always been preoccupied with what is best for NHO. I think it is sad that the situation has become such that he has to resign. He has been a good president,” Skogen Lund said.

Customs mistake. The trouble around the NHO president started long before Easter, when the program “Uppdrag gransking” (“Assignment Investigation”) on Swedish television focused on GC Rieber Oil’s purchase of fish oil from Western Sahara. Norwegian authorities believe that the Moroccan occupation of the area is contrary to human rights and have therefore asked the Norwegian business community to stay away from the area.

Friends of the Earth Norway has revealed that the buyer of the fish oil that Rieber imports from the disputed area is the state-owned fish-feed company EWOS. Friends of the Earth Norway recently also disclosed that CG Rieber Oils has given the customs authorities misleading information.

Friends of the Earth Norway claims that the incorrect coding has been deliberate and is a cover-up to conceal that state-owned EWOS uses fish oil from Western Sahara, at the same time that EWOS’s owner, the state, requests that the area be boycotted

“Nonsense!” “That there exists a conspiracy between EWOS and Rieber is pure nonsense,” Kjell Bjordal, chairman of the board of EWOS, stated.

The fish oil has been customs declared as if it came from Morocco, not from Western Sahara. Moreover, in the customs papers it was declared to be for human consumption, not for fish feed.

Neither the EWOS chairman nor Gunnar Album, fishery advisor to Friends of the Earth Norway, the man behind the revelations, believes that Rieber Oils can enrich itself economically by means of such a handling of the customs forms. Even though fish oil for human consumption is exempt from duty, and animal feed generally has customs duty, fish oil for fish feed is exempted from duty. GC Rieber Oils would automatically have been exempted if they had ticked off for animal feed and applied to the Norwegian Agricultural Authority to come in under the exemption for fish feed, the two believe.

The head of the Agricultural Authority, Ola Christian Rygh, confirms that there is a general customs exemption for fish feed. He will nevertheless not confirm that Rieber would have received exemption if he had applied, quite simply because Western Sahara is not included in the customs tariff; it is not a recognized country.

Pause for Thought. Kristin Skog Lund was silent for a long time when Aftenposten asked, “Can NHO live with having its leading representative trade with a country that Norwegian authorities have asked companies not to trade with?”

After having withdrawn to confer with one of her NHO advisors, Skogen Lund answered, “NHO advises its representatives to follow the authorities’ guidelines. With regard to Rieber, he has finished.”

Skogen Lund referred to the fact that Rieber Oils have terminated trade with Western Sahara. This did not happen as a result of a “settlement” but because EWOS no longer wanted to purchase the oil. The fish feed company got cold feet after the revelations in “Assignment Investigation” and statements by Norwegian authorities afterwards.

Met the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. On 8 April the board of directors of Rieber Oils and the board of EWOS and its parent company Cermaq had a meeting with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, during which the Ministry made it quite clear that it did not want any trade with Western Sahara at all. According to Bjordal, it was EWOS that had asked Rieber Oils to set up this meeting. After the meeting EWOS stated that it would no longer buy Rieber oil. On 14 April Rieber Oils announced that they no longer traded with Western Sahara.

The import and resale of the fish oil has been going on for at least 5-6 years, and EWOS is supposed to have been aware of the origin the whole time.

“We have discussed this with Rieber several times and have been assured that this had been approved by the Norwegian authorities,” Bjordal said.

According to Peter Hagen, public relations head of EWOS, Rieber Oils assured them as late as during the summer of 2009 that the trade with Western Sahara had been approved with the Norwegian authorities.

Paul-Christan Rieber has earlier called the incorrect registration with regard to the customs authorities a “slip-up”. Yesterday he was not available for further comments after having sent out a press release about his resignation out of consideration for NHO’s reputation.

EWOS never found it natural to inform its owner, the government, that it used products from Western Sahara. According to Sigbjørn Johnsen, the Minister of Finance and the previous chairman of the board of the parent company, Cermaq, Cermaq’s board was never informed of the import.



21.05 - 2019 / 16.04 - 2019Atlas Copco claims Morocco's phosphate plunder is legal
17.05 - 2019 / 06.05 - 2019EU elections: how have candidates voted on occupied Western Sahara?
10.05 - 2019 / 10.05 - 2019'We deserve an answer' from HeidelbergCement
02.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Has another cargo of fishmeal from Western Sahara arrived in Germany?
01.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Continental dodges question on Western Sahara
01.05 - 2019 / 17.04 - 2019Greek-Dutch construction group sets up shop in El Aaiun
30.04 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Polisario tries EU Council over new EU-Morocco agricultural deal
08.04 - 2019 / 04.04 - 2019New report on Western Sahara phosphate industry out now
30.03 - 2019 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
21.03 - 2019 / 15.03 - 2019Continental controversial contract in Western Sahara expires next year
28.02 - 2019 / 25.02 - 2019These are the MEPs who voted for the Western Sahara fish deal
25.02 - 2019 / 24.02 - 2019Bremen sheds light on massive controversial fishmeal import
12.02 - 2019 / 12.02 - 2019European Parliament disregards Court and adopts Morocco fish deal
11.02 - 2019 / 11.02 - 2019Human Rights Watch calls for Court referral of EU-Morocco fish deal
07.02 - 2019 / 07.02 - 2019110 MEPs want EU-Morocco fish deal referred to Court
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 2019Will European Parliament back deal with world's most unfree territory?
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 201998 Saharawi groups call on European Parliament to reject fish deal
04.02 - 2019 / 04.02 - 2019The runaway Green Reefers ship arrived Abidjan
31.01 - 2019 / 22.01 - 2019Spanish farmers concerned about EU deal for occupied Western Sahara
30.01 - 2019 / 24.01 - 2019EU Council refuses transparency on legal opinion on fish deal


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.

WSRW.org News Archive 2019
WSRW.org News Archive 2018
WSRW.org News Archive 2017
WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy