Maria Damanaki opposed continued EU fishing in Western Sahara

A document leaked by a Moroccan whistleblower indicates that former EU Commissioner for Fisheries did not want to renew the fisheries agreement with Morocco due to human rights violations in Western Sahara, but was allegedly pushed by the Head of the Commission, José Manuel Barroso.
Published: 02.12 - 2014 12:45Printer version    
The @chris_coleman24 twitter account keeps leaking official Moroccan documents. Today, it released a dispatch from Edward Gabriel, dated 10 May 2010, to the highest echelons of the Moroccan government, detailing what is described to be a conversation of one of Gabriel’s allies with Carmen Fraga Estevez, then head of the European Parliament’s Fisheries Committee.

Edward Gabriel, a former US Ambassador to Morocco, runs a Washington based lobby-firm that has the Moroccan government as a client since 2002. According to records filed under the US Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA), Gabriel’s firm has been paid more than US $ 3,7 million in order to advance Morocco’s agenda in the United States alone.

At the time of the abovementioned conversation, the European Commission had presented the European Parliament with a proposal to extend the EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) with one year. In the dispatch, Carmen Fraga is quoted as believing that this is “the maximum that can be achieved” because “a revision of the Fishery agreement with Morocco is very unlikely”.

Fraga is said to have cited several reasons, one being that the EU Commissioner for Fisheries at the time, Maria Damanaki, “is not willing [...] to get a new Fishery Agreement with Morocco. Ms Fraga told me that the President of the Commission [José Manuel Barroso, comment from WSRW] pushed Mrs Damanaki to extend the Protocol with one year. Commissioner Damanaki cites alleged violations of human rights by the Moroccan government”.

Carmen Fraga allegedly went on to say that the European Parliament’s rapporteur on the file, “Mr Haglund from the ALDE political group, the liberals, is not in favour of the extension of the Protocol and Commissioner Damanaki is not helpful either. Nevertheless, Mrs Fraga expects some pressure from the President of the Commission and believes that a small majority in favour of extending the Protocol may be mobilized”.

Carmen Fraga allegedly also gave lobby-advice to Gabriel’s informant, explaining which groups to influence.

Equally remarkable is how convinced Carmen Fraga appeared to be, according to Gabriel's anonymous source, by the Moroccan government’s position on Western Sahara. “Opponents claim that Morocco is not respecting human rights of the Saharan people and not supporting the Saharan people financially. Mrs Fraga is not persuaded by this argument. She accepts the position of the Moroccan government that everybody who lives in Western Sahara belongs to the Saharan people. The Moroccan government can prove it spends a lot of money on improvements of ports in the Western Sahara, together with EU money”.

That “proof” was a short powerpoint presentation, presenting Morocco’s plans to reform its fishing sector, provided at repeated insistence by the European Commission in 2010. However, the Commission had not requested a presentation of Morocco's plans, but rather a detailed document that would unequivocally prove how the Saharawis benefitted from Morocco’s fisheries agreement with the EU.

The Commission's request was yet another example of the its grave misinterpretation of the UN Legal Opinion on economic activities in Western Sahara, which concludes that such activities must be in accordance to the wishes and the interests of the Saharawi people. The Commission, choosing to ignore the Saharawi’s right to self-determination, solely chose to focus on the potential benefits. Furthermore, the Commission deemed it appropriate to ask Morocco, the occupying regime, to produce a report to demonstrate how its theft of the Saharawis’ resources were actually to their benefit. A practice which was slammed by the author of the UN Legal Opinion, Ambassador Hans Corell, as yet another misuse of his work.

However, Morocco – offended that it had to prove how it spent EU money in “its southern provinces” – did not present such any documentation for a very long time. After repeated requests from the European Commission, Morocco finally produced on 13 December 2010 a 44 page powerpoint presentation which did not even answer the original question. Instead, it gave some general information on port development plans in Morocco and Western Sahara, even failing to make the distinction between the two territories.

In December 2011, the European Parliament rejected the proposed one year extension of the EU-Morocco FPA.

WSRW has not confronted the persons quoted in the leak.



03.07 - 2020 / 02.07 - 2020Swiss supermarkets ban produce from occupied Western Sahara
03.07 - 2020 / 11.06 - 2020HeidelbergCement cites local benefits, ignores consent
02.07 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Fishmeal: German government data confirms import controversy
26.06 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Turkey: biggest funder of occupation of Western Sahara
25.06 - 2020 / 05.05 - 2020These are the vessels that provide fuel for the occupation
23.06 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Protesters set up roadblock to stop conflict minerals in New Zealand
13.06 - 2020 / 13.06 - 2020WSRW urges shareholders to challenge Continental
06.06 - 2020 / 06.06 - 2020Norwegian gas transport avoids Western Sahara at last minute
28.05 - 2020 / 28.05 - 2020World Bank removed erroneous maps
27.05 - 2020 / 27.04 - 2020Russia-Morocco controversial fisheries deal on the horizon
26.05 - 2020 / 26.05 - 2020Austrian chemical giant says no to Western Sahara trade
13.05 - 2020 / 11.05 - 2020Germany thumbs down OCP credit in Western Sahara  
11.05 - 2020 / 09.05 - 2020HeidelbergCement expands in occupied Western Sahara
10.05 - 2020 / 08.05 - 2020Equinor will no longer export gas to occupied Western Sahara
09.05 - 2020 / 08.05 - 2020Kiwi importers ignore government advice on Western Sahara
08.05 - 2020 / 04.05 - 2020Research service of Bundestag analyses Morocco's settlement policy  
07.05 - 2020 / 27.12 - 2018Caterpillar trucks carry conflict minerals
04.05 - 2020 / 24.04 - 2020First overview of gas imports into occupied Western Sahara
18.04 - 2020 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
08.04 - 2020 / 12.07 - 2019Portugal energy consultants fail in geography


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation. News Archive 2020 News Archive 2019 News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy