Kosmos cites political arguments to operate in Western Sahara

Kosmos gives geopolitical arguments to operate in occupied Western Sahara, while Cairn Energy refuses to answer why it operates in what they call "Morocco". WSRW has sought clarifications from the duo.
Published: 18.07 - 2016 16:12Printer version    
On 28 June 2016, the world's largest sovereign wealth fund blacklisted Kosmos Energy and Cairn Energy for operating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara without first seeking the proper consent from representatives of the people of the territory. The exclusion  was announvced together with a thorough analysis on the international law in the matter, documenting that Kosmos has failed to seek the right permissions.

Kosmos shortly after posted a series of letters and statements, expressing its disappointment. The letters are summarized on Kosmos's website westernsaharaoil.com.

Among the arguments used, is the statement that the geopolitical constellation has changed. This is in contrast with the "apolitical" position that the company claims having taken since 2011, when they after 7 years of presence stopped calling the territory "Southern Provinces" of "Morocco". No State in the world recognises the territory as being part of "Morocco", and a UN Legal Opinion from 2002 concludes that any further oil exploration will be in violation of international law.

On 12 July 2016, WSRW sent Kosmos Energy a letter with a number of questions to clarify what they mean in its argumentation of geopolitics:

  • According to Kosmos Energy, which are the geopolitical developments that have taken place since 2005 which alter the understanding of the ethics or legality of such operation on behalf of the Moroccan government in the coastal waters of Western Sahara?
  • In what ways, if any, does Kosmos believe that geopolitical developments are relevant for the understanding of international law applicable to the case of Western Sahara?
  • In what ways, if any, does Kosmos believe such a change in geopolitics has altered the fundamental rights of the Saharawi people to self-determination, including in respect of their land and resources?
  • In what ways, if any (and providing Kosmos agrees to the premise that the Saharawis have a right to self-determination), does Kosmos believe such a change in geopolitics has changed the necessity of Kosmos first seeking the consent of the people prior to signing any petroleum agreements in the territory?
  • The comment on Kosmos Energy’s view on geopolitics reminds of a statement of William Hayes, Kosmos Energy’s senior vice president of government affairs to Foreign Policy on 25 June 2014 where it is noted that “We feel good about the knowledge base we’ve got, we understand the other side of the position, and we honest to God feel like we are doing the right thing in partnering with Morocco. [..] We encourage the peace process to go on, and may the best party win». What does Kosmos Energy mean by “the best party”, and how does such a view fit with the UN approach that a solution to the conflict has to provide for the Saharawi people’s right to self-determination?

    WSRW on 28 June 2016 sent a letter to Cairn Energy. In the letter, WSRW asked five questions to Cairn Energy. In its reply to WSRW, on 5 July 2016, none of the questions were responded to. The questions were:

  • In the light of Cairn's references to the 2002 UN Legal Opinion, WSRW asked how that Cairn sees that this opinion  justifies or extends to allowing petroleum exploration in occupied Western Sahara in the face of sustained Saharawi individual, civil society and government protest.
  • In the light of Cairn's mentions of the "developing” of Western Sahara, and in need for “job creation” and “private sector investment”, WSRW asked how Cairn believes these Moroccan strategies and needs are in line with the wishes of the Saharawis and how Saharawi civil society groups which seek or advocate self-determination have been involved in the shaping of the strategies.
  • In the light of Cairn's mention that "The partners are committed to transparency and benefits sharing should exploration be successful”, WSRW asked how Cairn and its investors can be assured that the Saharawi people presently under occupation in coastal Western Sahara together with those Saharawi in refugee exile will derive benefits. How, in other words, will they as sovereigns “share” in the resource development and how would Cairn know whether the Saharawis are willing to share the resources that you are exploring.
  • WSRW wishes to receive clarifications as to why Cairn systematically refers to Western Sahara as part of Morocco on its website, in press releases and in annual reports.

    Cairn's reply to WSRW fails to respond to all these questions. Instead, arguments from previous correspondence is repeated. The only thing new in the mail is that Cairn states to be "a signatory to the UN Global Company" (sic).

    See also previous correspondence between WSRW and Cairn:
    Cairn to WSRW, 20 April 2016.
    WSRW to Cairn, 13 April 2016.
    Cairn to WSRW, dated 21 Apr 2014, received 26 Apr 2016
    WSRW to Cairn, 19 Feb 2014.



    09.09 - 2019 / 09.09 - 2019German trade fair should stop promoting Azura, groups say
    09.09 - 2019 / 05.09 - 2019Spanish farmers warn of fraudulent trade from occupied land
    08.09 - 2019 / 06.09 - 2019Protests continue against Ravensdown's blood phosphate imports
    03.09 - 2019 / 03.09 - 2019Kiwis take on New Zealand farmers' blood phosphate imports
    17.06 - 2019 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
    21.05 - 2019 / 16.04 - 2019Atlas Copco claims Morocco's phosphate plunder is legal
    17.05 - 2019 / 06.05 - 2019EU elections: how have candidates voted on occupied Western Sahara?
    10.05 - 2019 / 10.05 - 2019'We deserve an answer' from HeidelbergCement
    02.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Has another cargo of fishmeal from Western Sahara arrived in Germany?
    01.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Continental dodges question on Western Sahara
    01.05 - 2019 / 17.04 - 2019Greek-Dutch construction group sets up shop in El Aaiun
    30.04 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Polisario tries EU Council over new EU-Morocco agricultural deal
    08.04 - 2019 / 04.04 - 2019New report on Western Sahara phosphate industry out now
    21.03 - 2019 / 15.03 - 2019Continental controversial contract in Western Sahara expires next year
    28.02 - 2019 / 25.02 - 2019These are the MEPs who voted for the Western Sahara fish deal
    25.02 - 2019 / 24.02 - 2019Bremen sheds light on massive controversial fishmeal import
    12.02 - 2019 / 12.02 - 2019European Parliament disregards Court and adopts Morocco fish deal
    11.02 - 2019 / 11.02 - 2019Human Rights Watch calls for Court referral of EU-Morocco fish deal
    07.02 - 2019 / 07.02 - 2019110 MEPs want EU-Morocco fish deal referred to Court
    06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 2019Will European Parliament back deal with world's most unfree territory?


    Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
    EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


    It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
    Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


    Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
    Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


    Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
    Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


    At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.

    WSRW.org News Archive 2019
    WSRW.org News Archive 2018
    WSRW.org News Archive 2017
    WSRW.org News Archive 2016
    WSRW.org News Archive 2015
    WSRW.org News Archive 2014
    WSRW.org News Archive 2013
    WSRW.org News Archive 2012
    WSRW.org News Archive 2011
    WSRW.org News Archive 2010
    WSRW.org News Archive 2009
    WSRW.org News Archive 2008
    WSRW.org News Archive 2007
    WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006

    Register for our English newsletter:

    These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy