Ballance Agri-Nutrients admits to be buyer of seized cargo
ballance8_610.jpg

The company which hardly ever responds to concerns over their imports of conflict phosphates from occupied Western Sahara has now started talking.
Published: 04.05 - 2017 10:17Printer version    
The New Zealand fertiliser producer Ballance Agri-Nutrients has admitted to media in the country that the cargo which has been detained in South Africa this week is for them.

CEO Mark Wynne told Radio NZ on 4 May that the single shipment constituted a quarter of its annual imports for the year. He said his gut feeling is that the issue of the detained vessel will not be resolved immediately, but that it might take a number of weeks.

WSRW contacted Ballance Agri-Nutrients in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and never received answer to our questions from the company.

In 2015, as New Zealand TV did a piece on the imports, Ballance refused to comment. Instead, shortly after the New Zealand media coverage, Ballance posted an update to its shareholders.

New report on global phosphate trade from occupied Western Sahara
ic_india_610.jpgOver 200 million dollars worth of phosphate rock was shipped out of occupied Western Sahara last year, a new report from WSRW shows. New Zealand is second biggest importer, report uncovers.
In it, the company stated that it had "received advice that OCPs operations in Western Sahara meet the requirements of international law, in particular the relevant Resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations that the trade in resources is done in a manner consistent with the needs, interests and wishes of the local people."

The statement is peculiar:
  • Neither the Security Council nor the General Assembly have passed resolutions on trade with resources from Western Sahara in particular. What the General Assembly has done, however, is to generally pass resolutions on the plunder of colonies, and it has asked Morocco to terminate the occupation.
  • Ballance has not provided information about the authors of the advice of OCP's operation. The WSRW report P for Plunder 2016 mentions a Saharawi refugee who has contacted OCP 19 times to get copies of these opinions that is allegedly showing that her people benefit and wish the trade to take place. She never got an answer.
  • Ballance claims to operate in line with the wishes of the local people. However, Ballance systematically refuses to answer questions on what it has done to seek that consent. The issue of consent of the representatives of the people is the corner stone of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU in 21 December 2016, which stopped the inclusion of Western Sahara goods in the EU-Morocco trade deals. All WSRW's letters on this topic remain unanswered.

    In Ballance's annual report from 2007, the company states to be "extremely proud" of the relationship with OCP. Institutional shareholders, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds from all over the world have blacklisted OCP and other importers for not respecting basic international law.

    "Morocco is our largest supplier", Mr Wynne told Radio NZ today. It is not clear to WSRW whether this is correct. From what WSRW understands, Ballance does not get any phosphates from Morocco itself Mr. Wynne also states "it is possible" to get the phosphates from somewhere else, under certain preconditions.

    Mr. Wynne is referred to by Stuff.nz as having stated that it had imported more than 100 shipments "without a problem".

    "If it has only communicated only with the occupying power, of course Ballance sees no problem. Through decades of imports, Ballance has been one of the biggest funders in the world of the Moroccan illegal occupation of the territory. Leading opposition to the trade are serving life-time in jail, while the owners are malourished from not receiving enough humanitarian aid. Is that not a problem? Why does Ballance refuse to talk with the owners of the phosphates?", stated Erik Hagen of Western Sahara Resource Watch.




  •     

    Top
    News:

    28.07 - 2020 / 22.07 - 2020Will Deutsche Post's AGM provide clarity on Western Sahara operations?
    27.07 - 2020 / 01.07 - 2020New Indian construction company in occupied Western Sahara
    27.07 - 2020 / 20.07 - 2020Continental still unclear about future supplies to Western Sahara
    22.07 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Conflict Bitcoin miner keeps silent on Dakhla wind farm plans
    16.07 - 2020 / 29.06 - 2020Namibia slams Spain for failing to respect Saharawi rights
    03.07 - 2020 / 02.07 - 2020Swiss supermarkets ban produce from occupied Western Sahara
    03.07 - 2020 / 11.06 - 2020HeidelbergCement cites local benefits, ignores consent
    02.07 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Fishmeal: German government data confirms import controversy
    26.06 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Turkey: biggest funder of occupation of Western Sahara
    25.06 - 2020 / 05.05 - 2020These are the vessels that provide fuel for the occupation
    23.06 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Protesters set up roadblock to stop conflict minerals in New Zealand
    13.06 - 2020 / 13.06 - 2020WSRW urges shareholders to challenge Continental
    06.06 - 2020 / 06.06 - 2020Norwegian gas transport avoids Western Sahara at last minute
    28.05 - 2020 / 28.05 - 2020World Bank removed erroneous maps
    27.05 - 2020 / 27.04 - 2020Russia-Morocco controversial fisheries deal on the horizon
    26.05 - 2020 / 26.05 - 2020Austrian chemical giant says no to Western Sahara trade
    13.05 - 2020 / 11.05 - 2020Germany thumbs down OCP credit in Western Sahara  
    11.05 - 2020 / 09.05 - 2020HeidelbergCement expands in occupied Western Sahara
    10.05 - 2020 / 08.05 - 2020Equinor will no longer export gas to occupied Western Sahara
    09.05 - 2020 / 08.05 - 2020Kiwi importers ignore government advice on Western Sahara




    EN ES FR DE AR

    Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
    EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies

    tn_law_hammer.jpg

    It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
    Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

    tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

    Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.

    WSRW.org News Archive 2020
    WSRW.org News Archive 2019
    WSRW.org News Archive 2018
    WSRW.org News Archive 2017
    WSRW.org News Archive 2016
    WSRW.org News Archive 2015
    WSRW.org News Archive 2014
    WSRW.org News Archive 2013
    WSRW.org News Archive 2012
    WSRW.org News Archive 2011
    WSRW.org News Archive 2010
    WSRW.org News Archive 2009
    WSRW.org News Archive 2008
    WSRW.org News Archive 2007
    WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


    Register for our English newsletter:









    These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy