Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
swedish_delegation.jpg

"Sweden considers that the proposed mandate does not meet the requirements of international law", the official government statement reads.
Published: 15.02 - 2018 22:03Printer version    
Photo: Swedish Minister for Rural Affairs, Sven-Erik Bucht, at a recent EU Council meeting.

Sweden has announced its opposition to the European Commission's sought mandate to start negotiations with Morocco for a new fisheries agreement.

The statement by the Minister for Rural Affairs Sven-Erik Bucht reads: Sweden announced to Coreper on February 14 that Sweden intends to vote no to give the EU Commission a mandate to open negotiations on a new protocol to the EU Fisheries Partnership Agreement with Morocco. This is because Sweden considers that the proposed mandate does not meet the requirements of international law. The position is identical to previous Swedish behavior in the matter. Sweden also voted in 2012 not to give the European Commission a negotiating mandate for a new protocol.

Read the original text of the statement here (in Swedish).

The current fisheries protocol, set to expire in July 2018, is currently under review by the European Court of Justice. In January, the Advocate General of the Court presented his Opinion on the protocol, calling it "invalid". Over 90% of the EU's fishing activity under the deal takes place in the waters of Western Sahara, not in Morocco, the Advocate General's Opinion reads. As such, he concluded, the EU violates several legal principles, including the right of the people of Western Sahara to self-determination. The Court will present its judgment on 27 February.

The announcement of the Swedish government came as the mandate appeared on the agenda of COREPER (Committee of Permanent Representations of the EU). A decisive vote on the mandate at the level of the EU Ministers is expected next week.

"Sweden's position seems to have evolved towards one that is more compliant with international law and the CJEU ruling since that it had conditionally agreed to the opening of negotiations on the agriculture agreement. It is good to see Sweden take a firm position - one we we hope it will translate into national policy by issuing clear guidance to Swedish companies not to engage in Western Sahara", says Sara Eyckmans, coordinator of Western Sahara Resource Watch. Read WSRW's report on Swedish companies involvement in Western Sahara here.

In May 2017, Sweden was also the only EU Member State to issue a critical statement with regard to the EU Commission's request to be mandated to open negotiations with Morocco to cover trade with Western Sahara. Read that statement here. The Commission's move came on the back of a ruling by the EU Court of Justice in December 2016, concluding that no EU-Morocco trade or association deal could be applied to Western Sahara unless with the explicit consent of the people of the territory.

Sweden has before taken a position that is rooted in law and respect for the people of Western Sahara's right to self-determination. In 2012, Sweden was one of several EU Member States to vote against the EU-Morocco fisheries protocol. Other countries that did not support the deal back then were the UK, Netherlands, Denmark, Finland, Austria and Cyprus.


Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.




    

Top
News:

18.09 - 2018 / 18.09 - 2018Polisario files legal complaint against French seafood company
13.09 - 2018 / 13.09 - 2018The New Zealand phosphate controversy for dummies
13.09 - 2018 / 13.09 - 2018US imports of Western Sahara conflict rock to end
07.09 - 2018 / 04.09 - 2018Frozen fish flying from occupied Western Sahara to Spain
31.08 - 2018 / 31.08 - 2018European Parliament "fact finding" mission to Western Sahara
21.08 - 2018 / 20.08 - 2018ISOCARD backtracks on moving camel conference out of Western Sahara
20.08 - 2018 / 09.08 - 2018Sweden says EU-Morocco trade proposal fails court ruling
09.08 - 2018 / 31.07 - 2018Bitcoins behind giant wind farm controversy in occupied Western Sahara
27.07 - 2018 / 25.07 - 2018Morocco grants only 5% of fishing licences off Dakhla to Saharawis
26.07 - 2018 / 23.07 - 2018EU Court confirms: Western Sahara not part of EU-Morocco fish deal
25.07 - 2018 / 07.07 - 2018Large Russian-Chinese-British oil study in Western Sahara
23.07 - 2018 / 20.07 - 2018EU and Morocco today initial new fish deal including Western Sahara
23.07 - 2018 / 22.07 - 2018Key player quits dirty Western Sahara phosphate game
22.07 - 2018 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
19.07 - 2018 / 19.07 - 2018Fishmeal from occupied Western Sahara now being unloaded in Germany
17.07 - 2018 / 17.07 - 2018Caught fishing illegally in occupied Western Sahara
16.07 - 2018 / 16.07 - 2018Polisario condemns Council's approval of Western Sahara trade deal
16.07 - 2018 / 16.07 - 2018EU Council approves Morocco trade deal to include Western Sahara
16.07 - 2018 / 16.07 - 2018EU vessels return home in absense of new EU-Morocco fish deal
06.07 - 2018 / 06.07 - 2018EU Parliament backs self-determination - split on EU Court ruling




EN ES FR DE AR

Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies

tn_law_hammer.jpg

It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!

tn_court_photo_gdeim_izik_610.jpg

Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder

tn_poweringplunder_eng_610.jpg

At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.

WSRW.org News Archive 2018
WSRW.org News Archive 2017
WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


Register for our English newsletter:









These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy