Kosmos Energy maintains propaganda site after Western Sahara exit

Kosmos Energy has decided to keep their website defending Western Sahara oil search - even after they have left the territory.
Published: 06.03 - 2018 00:21Printer version    
On 9 January 2015, at a time when the US energy company Kosmos Energy received massive critique from the Western Sahara people for its first ever oil drilling in the territory under 40 years of Moroccan occupation, the company established a website to argue why it wasn't doing anything wrong.

Kosmos has now announced that, even after its withdrawal from the territory, it wishes to maintain the site, in order "to showcase our belief that responsible resource development has the potential to create significant social and economic benefits and to provide energy security for the region". The site can be found on www.westernsaharaoil.com The properties of the website was last updated 2 January 2018, just over a week after the company withdrew from the territory on 21 December 2017.

The entire website is based on the premise that it is legal and right to operate in the territory as long as the local "population" benefits from such operations.

The site even makes incorrect references to  UN resolutions and documents, including a UN Legal Opinion from 2002 about oil search from 2002, stating that the Opinion "concluded that exploration and development of resources in non-self-governing territories are consistent with international law if they are in the best interests of people in those territories".

That is incorrect. The Opinion specifically stated that two prerequisites must be met in order for such activities to be lawful: such oil exploration must be in line with the wishes and the interests of the people. The key point is the word 'wishes'. No oil search can take place if the people there do not want it. Kosmos never obtained permission from Western Sahara for the oil search - something that was done uniquely in partnership with the neighbouring country of Morocco.

The author of the UN Legal Opinion states that Kosmos is violating the principles of the Opinion and basic Corporate Responsibility standards. The Court of Justice of the EU (article 106) specifically states in a judgment in 2016 that the issue of benefits is not necessary to assess - the key test is whether the people of Western Sahara have consented to business deals.

Yet, the Kosmos propaganda site advocates that their operations - signed with the government of the occupying power - are to the benefit and therefore positive to Western Sahara.

On the frontpage of the website, a statement has been made regarding the continuation of the site:

"This website was originally developed to explain Kosmos Energy’s work offshore Western Sahara and the potential benefits these activities could bring to the people of the territory. Following a review of our global operations, Kosmos reached the difficult decision to withdraw from our exploration commitments offshore Western Sahara after more than a decade of significant investment in the territory. This website will remain online to showcase our belief that responsible resource development has the potential to create significant social and economic benefits and to provide energy security for the region."

Kosmos Energy and the Moroccan state oil company ONHYM in a statement 6 February 2018 decleared that the company "leaves open the possibility to start discussions with ONHYM for a possible return regarding the oil exploration in Morocco". It is not clear what this means. Strangely, Kosmos never left Morocco, where it still has another operation.  What could be meant, is that the two parties referred to a return to the controversial block offshore the occupied territory. This would also explain why Kosmos would keep its propagada website.

Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.



17.05 - 2019 / 06.05 - 2019EU elections: how have candidates voted on occupied Western Sahara?
10.05 - 2019 / 10.05 - 2019'We deserve an answer' from HeidelbergCement
02.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Has another cargo of fishmeal from Western Sahara arrived in Germany?
01.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Continental dodges question on Western Sahara
01.05 - 2019 / 17.04 - 2019Greek-Dutch construction group sets up shop in El Aaiun
30.04 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Polisario tries EU Council over new EU-Morocco agricultural deal
08.04 - 2019 / 04.04 - 2019New report on Western Sahara phosphate industry out now
30.03 - 2019 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
21.03 - 2019 / 15.03 - 2019Continental controversial contract in Western Sahara expires next year
28.02 - 2019 / 25.02 - 2019These are the MEPs who voted for the Western Sahara fish deal
25.02 - 2019 / 24.02 - 2019Bremen sheds light on massive controversial fishmeal import
12.02 - 2019 / 12.02 - 2019European Parliament disregards Court and adopts Morocco fish deal
11.02 - 2019 / 11.02 - 2019Human Rights Watch calls for Court referral of EU-Morocco fish deal
07.02 - 2019 / 07.02 - 2019110 MEPs want EU-Morocco fish deal referred to Court
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 2019Will European Parliament back deal with world's most unfree territory?
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 201998 Saharawi groups call on European Parliament to reject fish deal
04.02 - 2019 / 04.02 - 2019The runaway Green Reefers ship arrived Abidjan
31.01 - 2019 / 22.01 - 2019Spanish farmers concerned about EU deal for occupied Western Sahara
30.01 - 2019 / 24.01 - 2019EU Council refuses transparency on legal opinion on fish deal
27.01 - 2019 / 07.01 - 2019Nutrien maintains Western Sahara link via China


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.

WSRW.org News Archive 2018
WSRW.org News Archive 2017
WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy