SiemensGamesa massively prolongs plunder windmill contract

95% of the energy needed by Morocco to plunder the phosphates of Western Sahara is delivered via SiemensGamesa windmills. The company has now prolonged its service contract for the controversial windmills for another 15 years, while continuing to refuse to comment on Saharawi consent.
Published: 07.12 - 2018 13:17Printer version    
22 windmills from SiemensGamesa are supplying 95 % of the energy needed by the Moroccan state phosphate company OCP to plunder the territory's non-renewable phosphate resources.

The mills were delivered by Siemens in 2013, and the deal was followed with a five-year maintenance contract. That contract thus expired in 2018.

On the occasion of the termination of the Siemens maintenance agreement, WSRW sent a letter to SiemensGamesa inquiring into what happened next. In a response from Siemens Gamesa to WSRW on 16 November 2018, the company clarifies that the contract has been prolonged for another 15 (!) years.

The role of Siemens in Morocco's illegal depletion of occupied Western Sahara's mineral resources is covered in the 2016 WSRW report Powering the Plunder. SiemensGamesa's projects are carried out in partnership with a company belonging to the king of Morocco.

WSRW also requested SiemensGamesa to clarify what it has done to seek the permission from the people of the territory. However, SiemensGamesa is still refusing to clarify that point. The CEO of SiemensGamesa Renewable Energy, Dr. Markus Tacke, wrote that the company "does not take a stance or make judgments on issues of international public law".

"We doubt Siemens would argue that benefits to the local population is a good reason to invest in occupied Crimea. So why does it argue in such way in Western Sahara? We condemn SiemensGamesa for failing to respect the rights of the Saharawi people. SiemensGamesa's approach to the conflict, telling the world that the company knows better what the Saharawis want than the Saharawis themselves, is a deeply colonialist attitude, and goes directly against the principle of self-determination", says Sara Eyckmans of Western Sahara Resource Watch.

In 2016, the Court of Justice of the EU concluded that the aspects of benefits are irrelevant to assessing the legal nature of business activities in Western Sahara. The judgment does not refer to the "population" at all. What is required is the consent of the people of the territory.

SiemensGamesa also does not respond to the question as to whether it believes Western Sahara to be separate from Morocco. The company states that "the region of Western Sahara is disputed with the United Nations", even though the UN is in fact not considering it disputed or a region. The term "region" is a Moroccan term, while the UN labels it a "territory".

Siemens' lack of knowledge relating to the territory being separate from Morocco is also visible on presentations after 2013. The website of Siemens still refers to the 50MW park as being in Morocco. Here is a presentation from 2015 and one from 2014.

To date, Siemens has been involved in practically all wind farms in the territory - all of them part of the portfolio of the King of Morocco's wind energy firm Nareva:
 Siemens supplied wind mill parts for the operational 50 MW Foum el Oued park;
 Together with Enel Green Energy and Nareva, Siemens won the tender for the construction of the 300 MW Tiskrad wind farm and the 100 MW Boujdour farm.
 Siemens is providing the parts for the construction of the 200 MW Aftissat wind farm.
There is one other 5 MW wind farm that is privately owned by the CIMAR factory in El Aaiun. In addition, WSRW has found few references to plans of building another 400 MW wind farm near Boujdour - not a lot of information is available on those plans, and WSRW has not come across Siemens' name in connection to the project.

Since you're here....
WSRWs work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work 3, 5, 27 what you can spare the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.



17.06 - 2019 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
21.05 - 2019 / 16.04 - 2019Atlas Copco claims Morocco's phosphate plunder is legal
17.05 - 2019 / 06.05 - 2019EU elections: how have candidates voted on occupied Western Sahara?
10.05 - 2019 / 10.05 - 2019'We deserve an answer' from HeidelbergCement
02.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Has another cargo of fishmeal from Western Sahara arrived in Germany?
01.05 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Continental dodges question on Western Sahara
01.05 - 2019 / 17.04 - 2019Greek-Dutch construction group sets up shop in El Aaiun
30.04 - 2019 / 30.04 - 2019Polisario tries EU Council over new EU-Morocco agricultural deal
08.04 - 2019 / 04.04 - 2019New report on Western Sahara phosphate industry out now
21.03 - 2019 / 15.03 - 2019Continental controversial contract in Western Sahara expires next year
28.02 - 2019 / 25.02 - 2019These are the MEPs who voted for the Western Sahara fish deal
25.02 - 2019 / 24.02 - 2019Bremen sheds light on massive controversial fishmeal import
12.02 - 2019 / 12.02 - 2019European Parliament disregards Court and adopts Morocco fish deal
11.02 - 2019 / 11.02 - 2019Human Rights Watch calls for Court referral of EU-Morocco fish deal
07.02 - 2019 / 07.02 - 2019110 MEPs want EU-Morocco fish deal referred to Court
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 2019Will European Parliament back deal with world's most unfree territory?
06.02 - 2019 / 06.02 - 201998 Saharawi groups call on European Parliament to reject fish deal
04.02 - 2019 / 04.02 - 2019The runaway Green Reefers ship arrived Abidjan
31.01 - 2019 / 22.01 - 2019Spanish farmers concerned about EU deal for occupied Western Sahara
30.01 - 2019 / 24.01 - 2019EU Council refuses transparency on legal opinion on fish deal


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi peoples social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Moroccos renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2019 News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy