Things are heating up on the eve of the European Parliament's vote on the proposal to incorporate the parts of Western Sahara occupied by Morocco into the EU-Morocco trade deal.
The liberal group (presumably on the instigation of its lead MEP on the file, Ms Marietje Schaake) has now suggested a so-called split vote on a particular paragraph in her report that refers to the UN. A split-vote is seen as the last available option to delete parts of the report once the deadline for amendments has been passed.
Concretely, Schaake suggests to split the sentence on the UN into two parts, and have Parliament vote on each part separately.
As it stands, the sentence that is paragraph 9 reads:"Underlines that throughout the consultation process the Commission and the EEAS maintained regular contact with the team of the UN Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy for Western Sahara to ensure that the proposed agreement supports UN efforts to achieve a lasting settlement".
Schaake's suggestion is to split that sentence into one part saying "Underlines that throughout the consultation process the Commission and the EEAS maintained regular contact with the team of the UN Secretary-General’s Personal Envoy for Western Sahara", and a second part that reads " to ensure that the proposed agreement supports UN efforts to achieve a lasting settlement".
Schaake did not ink the report herself; she inherited the finished version from her predecessor Patricia Lalonde (French liberal) who resigned from her post as rapporteur on 10 December 2018 after revelations in EU media that she had been an active member of a Moroccan-sponsored lobby group. Lalonde is at present under investigation for her potential violation of the Parliament's code of conduct.
Schaake now exhibits having a different take on the file than her predecessor. Her suggestion to split the above paragraph for a vote would seem to imply that she does not agree with the sentence as written by Lalonde and considers the second part to be incorrect. It may therefore be understood that the leading MEP on the Western Sahara trade file is thus telling the world that she does not believe that the agreement would somehow help along the UN's peace process.
This position is consistent with the amendment Schaake had already put forth to her own report, introducing a paragraph that calls for according trade preferences to the people of Western Sahara in its entirety - underlining that the agreement violates Western Sahara's territorial integrity by only creating potential benefits to the part that is under Moroccan occupation. The people of Western Sahara living in the parts that are not under Morocco's military presence do not get any trade benefits at all.
The chaos in Parliament seems a natural culmination of an already unfathomable process.
Following the EU Court of Justice's ruling that EU-Morocco trade preferences can only be applied in Western Sahara with the consent of the people of Western Sahara, the EU Commission went on to negotiate the inclusion of the territory with Morocco - ignoring the Saharawis completely. The Commission could not present any impact assessment or even a statistic on the trade volumes - unthinkable in any other trade negotiations context. A meeting that the UN-recognised representatives of the Saharawi people, the Polisario Front, had requested to explore trade cooperation with the EU, was hi-jacked to make it appear as if the Commission had consulted Polisario on its proposal. A protest letter signed by almost 100 Western Sahara civil society organisations received the same treatment. The Commission accepts Morocco's rejection of a reliable traceability mechanism ensuring transparency on the true origin of products imported into the EU under the deal, in spite of EU legislation making such basic information mandatory on food products.
The Parliament's original Rapporteur, Patricia Lalonde, was exposed by EU media as a board member of a think tank working for Morocco, with the stated intent of "putting into perspective the specificity of the Sahara region, its strategic geopolitical aspect and the importance of its economic, social and environmental sustainable development". Lalonde's report, calling on the European Parliament to consent to the proposed deal, contains misleading and outright false claims. Yet on the day of her resignation - as a parliamentary investigation into her potential breach of Parliament's code of conduct was launched - her report was voted on in the Parliament's committee for International Trade. And it is this report that acts as the basis - without as much as a public debate on it - for the vote in plenary tomorrow.
Since you're here.... WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.