DHL: ignoring Saharawi rights for 5 parcels a day

The Board of Deutsche Post AG completely missed the opportunity to explain its controversial activities in occupied Western Sahara.
Published: 08.09 - 2020 10:26Printer version    
On 27 August 2020, the German multinational Deutsche Post AG held its Annual General Meeting on a virtual platform. Shareholders had urged the company to comment on its poor results in an independent human rights assessment, and on its operations in Moroccan occupied Western Sahara - the Non-Self-Governing Territory where DHL, the company's express delivery section, has been operating a branch in capital city El Aaiún since 2016.

In response to questions on its contractual partners for the El Aaiún branch, Deutsche Post AG explained no more than that its "services are provided in El Aaiún by a local agent".

The Board further stated that "With our services (...), we enable the population to participate in the global economy and international exchange", and that "most of the 2000 shipments a year handled by the El Aaiún branch concern diplomats and the UN mission MINURSO" - thus not Saharawis.

‘This claim is misleading in at least two respects: it is questionable that DHL’s presence is beneficial for the Saharawi people. Accoding to UNHCR estimates, around 175,000 Saharawis live in refugee camps in Algeria, while Moroccan settlers outnumber Saharawis by 3:1 in their occupied homeland. Nevertheless, no potential benefit can replace the Saharawi people's prior, free and informed consent, which is pivotal under international public law", Tim Sauer from WSRW commented.

WSRW has transcribed and translated the answers that Deutsche Post provided during its AGM with regard to its Western Sahara activities. Find the English version here.

Since 1975, Morocco has held three-quarters of Western Sahara under military occupation. Since 2015, consecutive Rulings by the European Court of Justice have confirmed that Western Sahara is a territory that is "separate and distinct" to Morocco, and that as such, no EU-Morocco economic agreement can be applied to the territory unless with the express consent of the Saharawi people through their UN-recognised representation, the Polisario Front.

Deutsche Post AG has never asked the Saharawi people anything.

Similarly, the company seems to share Morocco’s position on the status of the territory. The above photo used by DHL Maroc fails to distinguish between the two territories. Its El Aaiún branch is listed as located in Morocco under the same country code, justified by the company through the non-existence of a custom border and the shared postcode. This adoption of Morocco's unilaterally imposed administrative system is contrary to the UN position on Western Sahara and the fact that no country in the world recognises Morocco’s claim to the territory. In a 2019 opinion, the Research Services of German Bundestag concluded that Morocco should be "considered as the occupying power" of Western Sahara.

It can only be speculated why Deutsche Post AG engages in such a controversial business on occupied land, given the presumably small profit generated by 2000 shipments a year. By comparison: in 2019, Deutsche Post AG handled an average of more than 500,000 letters per branch in Germany.

The questions at the AGM were raised by Dachverband der Kritischen Aktionäre und Aktionärinnen in collaboration with Western Sahara Resource Watch, which had contacted the company already in May 2020. In its letter, WSRW emphasised the "special responsibility of KfW" (Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau), the German state-owned development bank, which holds 20.6% of the shares of Deutsche Post AG. KfW, in line with the German Federal Government’s position, has explicitly excluded activities in Western Sahara from a development credit granted to Morocco’s state-owned phosphate company (OCP). Deutsche Post has still not replied.

Responsible Investor magazine
recently covered Deutsche Post AG’s operations in Western Sahara, qualifying the issue " a test case for EU’s human rights due diligence law initiative".



12.10 - 2020 / 12.10 - 2020Russian fisheries still absent from Western Sahara
07.10 - 2020 / 07.10 - 2020West African controversial fish imports resume
05.10 - 2020 / 02.10 - 2020LATEST: No more Swedish supplies to the Bou Craa mine
08.09 - 2020 / 16.06 - 2020Soon 10 years of wrongful imprisonment: release Gdeim Izik group now
08.09 - 2020 / 07.09 - 2020DHL: ignoring Saharawi rights for 5 parcels a day
24.08 - 2020 / 24.08 - 2020Concrete plans for third solar plant in occupied Western Sahara
10.08 - 2020 / 18.07 - 2020Voltalia to construct wind farm in occupied Western Sahara
28.07 - 2020 / 22.07 - 2020Will Deutsche Post's AGM provide clarity on Western Sahara operations?
27.07 - 2020 / 01.07 - 2020New Indian construction company in occupied Western Sahara
27.07 - 2020 / 20.07 - 2020Continental still unclear about future supplies to Western Sahara
22.07 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Conflict Bitcoin miner keeps silent on Dakhla wind farm plans
19.07 - 2020 / 13.07 - 2020Siemens yet again evades questions on Western Sahara
16.07 - 2020 / 29.06 - 2020Namibia slams Spain for failing to respect Saharawi rights
03.07 - 2020 / 02.07 - 2020Swiss supermarkets ban produce from occupied Western Sahara
03.07 - 2020 / 11.06 - 2020HeidelbergCement cites local benefits, ignores consent
02.07 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Fishmeal: German government data confirms import controversy
26.06 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Turkey: biggest funder of occupation of Western Sahara
25.06 - 2020 / 05.05 - 2020These are the vessels that provide fuel for the occupation
23.06 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Protesters set up roadblock to stop conflict minerals in New Zealand
13.06 - 2020 / 13.06 - 2020WSRW urges shareholders to challenge Continental


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation. News Archive 2020 News Archive 2019 News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy