On 15 March 2018, the Moroccan Official Journal published a Ministerial Order according an Agricultural Label to "camel cheese from the Sahara" ("Fromage de Chamelle du Sahara"). The label had been requested by the cooperative "Ajbane Dakhla" - a Dakhla based cooperative seeking the protective clause for its camel cheese. The Moroccan government grants such labels in recognition of a product that distinguishes itself from similar products in terms of production conditions and geographical origin. Only cheese made with milk from local camel species, and respecting certain conditions with regard to product characteristics, production and preservation standards, can be called "camel cheese from the Sahara".
It is the second product made in occupied Western Sahara that receives a protective measure based on its origin under Moroccan law. In June 2017, "Camel milk from the Sahara" was registered as a Geographical Indication (GI), to be granted to all camel farmers who meet certain conditions and who are from the Oued Eddahad area, which is located in its entirety in occupied Western Sahara.
Contentious Camel Conference
The International Society of Camelid Research and Development (ISOCARD) is this year hosting its triennial conference in El Aaiun, the capital city of occupied Western Sahara. The conference is scheduled to take place from 12 to 15 November 2018. Documents relating to the conference, such as the call for abstracts, all locate "Laâyoune" in "Morocco". WSRW on 27 March 2018 wrote the organisation to request the conference location be moved to Morocco proper. WSRW also wrote to the organisation's 260 members with the same request. The conference is co-sponsored by the Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations (FAO) and World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). UPDATE, 13.04.2018: FAO and OIE has written to WSRW that they have nothing to do with the conference.A geographical indication is a distinctive sign used to identify a product as originating in a particular country, region or locality where its quality, reputation or other characteristics are linked to its geographical origin. Famous examples are champagne, cognac, parmigian cheese, darjeeling tea, etc. Champagne can only be called champagne if it actually comes from the Champagne region in France. But also non-geographical names can be protected if linked to a particular place; e.g. Feta cheese is not named after a place but so closely connected to Greece that it is identified as a Greek product.
As such, GIs are a protective measure of economic and cultural value, to prevent misuse and counterfeiting.
Under a proposed EU-Morocco GI deal, camel milk and camel cheese from occupied Western Sahara would thus receive protection as a product registered by Morocco.
In January 2015, the European Commission and Morocco initialed a Geographical Indications agreement, that would protect around 3200 EU products versus 28 Moroccan products. The list of GIs that Morocco shared with the EU dated 9 January 2013 consisted of 14 wines and 14 agricultural products. At that time did not seem to include a product from Western Sahara. Find the proposed text, including the list of registered GIs, here.
If and when the agreement would be adopted, it would be possible for Morocco to register Western Sahara products as eligible for a GI in the future. That registration would be an exclusive Moroccan affair, not requiring EU approval. The objective of these measures is to offer direct protection to the geographical indications registered by the parties on the basis of their own legislation
Former EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, stated in June 2011: "Morocco could register as geographical indications products originating in Western Sahara if they respond to the criteria fixed by its legislation in this field".
The GI deal is still undergoing review by the European Parliament, which was expected to vote on the proposed agreement in 2016. The process was put on hold, however, following legal developments on the EU-Morocco agriculture agreement in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The EU Court ruled that no EU Trade or Association Agreement could be applied to Western Sahara, because it has a "separate and distinct status" from Morocco. The proposed GI deal forms an integral part of the Association Agreement.
"Based on the 2016 judgement of CJEU, and on the news that Morocco openly has intention to seek protection to products originating from Western Sahara, WSRW calls on the EU to not adopt an agreement unless it is specifically stated that Morocco can only apply the agreement to products originating from places inside the territory of Morocco as internationally recognised", stated Sara Eyckmans of Western Sahara Resource Watch.
Since you're here.... WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.