Greenpeace prevents pirates in the Swedish port of Gothenburg
Press release, Greenpeace Sweden - Greenpeace is blocking a Swedish pirate vessel that is fishing illegally in the waters of Western Sahara. 20 Greenpeace activists are preventing the Nordic IV from leaving the port of Fiskebäck by blocking the quay and having activists in a rubber boat.

Read also: Afrol: Western Sahara-bound fishing vessel hijacked
Published: 11.06 - 2008 21:53Printer version    
Press release
Greenpeace, 11 June 2008

The fishing vessel Nordic IV is just one of many large industrial trawlers that is overfishing in Africa and impoverishing the fish stocks there. Greenpeace demands that the boat and its owner are detained, prosecuted and punished.

"These are real pirates who we are dealing with here" says Staffan Danielsson, spokesperson of Maritime Affairs for Greenpeace at the site in Fiskebäck. They are fishing illegally and their overfishing is destroying not only the marine environment but also the lives of local people who loose both their opportunity for jobs and food.

As the EU's fishing fleet is twice as large as it ought to be, and 88 percent of the fish stocks in the EU are overfished, the EU uses third-country agreements, for example with Morocco, to export the overcapacity of the fishing fleet. Taxpayers in the EU pays subsidies for this overfishing in African waters to continue. Nordic IV however lacks permission from the Swedish Board of Fisheries, as well as from the EU and therefore is fishing illegally. Nordic IV has been reported to the police by the Swedish Board of Fisheries and an investigation is ongoing.

"Nordic IV carries the flag of the Pasific nation Cook Islands and its ownership is hidden in the taxhaven Guernsey in the English Channel. Regardless of how the Swedish owners have cleaned up their paper trail, they leave clear tracks in the sea and help to prolong the armed conflict in Western Sahara", says Staffan Danielsson.

Greenpeace demands that the boat and its owner are detained, prosecuted and punished.

Western Sahara is occupied by Morocco and the bloody conflict has been going on since 1975. Sweden has in the UN and the EU protested against the occupation and voted against the fisheries agreement which the EU and Morocco signed in 2005. Nordic IV has signed an agreement of its own with Morocco.

"Nordic IV's overfishing in the region contributes to that the occupation of Western Sahara can continue", says Staffan Danielsson. It is, therefore, the issue of multiple crimes here, both legally and morally. On top of all exploitation of marine resources they also support an occupying power. The local population does not get any part of the profits from fishing.

The management of fish resources in the EU and globally has foundered, partly due to poaching and partly because of politicians' inability to cope with overcapacity in the fleets. In Sweden efforts are now being made to scrap half the trawlers fleet, partly with EU money. Earlier attempts have failed miserably.

Before the reform of the EU's common fisheries policy 2012  Greenpeace demands that:

• The overcapacity in fishing fleets disappear,
• third-country agreements are completely re-written so that they first and foremost help building credible and independent fisheries research facilities and management in the partner countries before any fish can be brought to the EU,
• that all fishing must be managed in accordance with the principle of Ecosystems, so that fish also is an essential part of the marine environment and not just a commodity,
• that large maritime reserves be created so that fish stocks and marine environment can recover,
• that the subsidies to the fishing industry disappear,
• that poaching is stopped,
• the environmental unfriendly fishing methods such as bottom trawling are prohibited.

An investigation against Nordic IV is underway in Gothenburg under the leadership of the prosecutor James von Reis.

Translated from Swedish by Western Sahara Resource Watch




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy