Norwegian investor divests from Australian phosphate importer
Norwegian insurance company divests from Australian fertilizer importer over imports from Western Sahara.
Published: 26.06 - 2010 13:33Printer version    
"The companies [Astom and Wesfarmers] are excluded due to violations of KLP's ethical guidelines and because they have not rectified criticisable conditions or in other way signalled a way to solve their problem", says Mari Thjømøe, president for economy and finance, according to a press release today (in Norwegian).

The news below was published in leading Norwegian business daily, Dagens Næringsliv (see original here -in Norwegian).

Two more companies on blacklist
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse Mutual Insurance Company (KLP) has excluded two further companies from its investment universe. Check the whole list below.

Dagens IT
By Kristin Vallevik Gjerde and Cecilie Langum
3 December 2007

On Monday KLP presented its updated semi-annual list of companies that are excluded from its investment universe. Typical companies to be excluded are those that can be associated with breaches of the UN’s norms and with producers of tobacco and illegal weapons. In addition, recommendations from the Advisory Council on Ethics for the Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global are followed.

Human Rights
To the list of excluded companies have been added the energy companies Alstom and Wesfarmers, both because of breaches of human rights.

The French company Alstom has been excluded because of human-rights breaches at a hydroelectric-power project in Sudan. A special envoy for the UN Human Rights Council called upon, among others, Alston, which is the main supplier of electric equipment for the project, to halt operations because of reports of human rights breaches in connection with criticisable conditions and the forced transfer of about 50,000 people.

KLP also excludes the fertiliser producer Wesfarmer as a result of illegal import of phosphate from Western Sahara. The area is occupied by Morocco, and in 2002 the UN declared all extraction of natural resources in West Saharsa as illegal.

Not Pleasant
The head of Alstom in Norway, Svein Ole Strømmen, received the message just before 11 a.m.

“We do not especially like this,” he told “We supply equipment for a hydroelectric-power project in Sudan which is led by Chinese. Alstom in Norway has nothing to do with this,” he added.

“What is now being done internally in the corporation?”

“It’s a little too soon for me to comment. I will check how the corporation is dealing with this, but it is not pleasant for the corporation to land on such a list,” Strømmen said.

According to its web pages, Wesfarmers attaches great importance to its reputation and to being a responsible company.

Ethical Filtration
In 2002, KLP was the first Norwegian insurance company to subject all its financial investments to an ethical filtration. The ten principles of the UN’s Global Compact constitute the basis for the company’s criteria, and the OECD’s guidelines for multinational companies and the ethical guidelines for the Government Pension Fund – Global are also considered.

“We believe our influence has become even greater. The investors that are best equipped for the future are those that have cleaned up their acts. But it is demanding to live up to the principles,” Mari Thjømøe, corporate director of KLP, said at today’s press conference.  

According to KLP, constantly more funds are being subjected to ethical principles. In Europe outside Scandinavia this applied to 10-15% of the capital in 2005, a 36% increase compared with 2002. This amounts to €1003 billion. In Norway 45% is subjected to ethical guidelines.    

But KLP is not just involved in exclusions.

“It may be smart to attend general assemblies and raise our voice in companies we have invested in if there are things we are concerned about,” Aage Schanning, head of KLP, said.  

In from the Cold
Halliburton and Anvil Mining have been removed from the exclusion list, whereas Ryanair is on the observation list because of dubious methods with regard to labour law.

The American oil service company Halliburton has put the corruption accusations behind and has been included in the portfolio again. Halliburton’s subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root (KBR) was associated with systematic corruption and unethical business practice and was excluded by KLP in 2005.    

“We are including Halliburton in the portfolio again because the company has accepted its responsibility and taken the consequences of the unethical business practice and criticisable conditions. Halliburton has also taken a stand to prevent similar occurrences in the future,” Jeanett Bergan, advisor for responsible investments in KLP Investment Management, said.

Anvil Mining is also back in the investment portfolio. The company was associated with participation in a massacre in Congo. Anvil Mining has had a positive development since that occurrence in 2004 and has invested a considerable amount of work to implement “Voluntary Principles for Security and Human Rights”, according to KLP.

KLP’s blacklist is therefore as follows
Grupo Ferrovial
Sodexho Alliance
Duke Energy
Exxon Mobil
Freeport McMoran
L3 Communications
Marathon Oil
Singapore Technologies
Toyota Motor
Alliant Techsystems
General Dynamic Corporation
Lockheed Martin
United Technologies
BAE Systems
Altadis Sa
Altria Group Inc
Brit Amer Tobacco
Imperial Tobacco
Japan Tobacco
Swedish Match

KLP has now excluded 41 companies from its investment portfolios. Three companies are excluded because of corruption, six because of human rights breaches, four as a result of breaches of the workers’ international rights, and four as a result of serious environmental offences. In addition, 16 companies are excluded because of weapons production and 10 because they produce tobacco.  

Translated from Norwegian by the Norwegian Support Committee for Western Sahara.




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy