ABC: "Australian phosphate importers violate Australian law"

Sydney barrister is calling on three major Australian companies to stop their imports from occupied Western Sahara, saying the firms might be liable to future compensation claims from the people of the territory. ABC, 10 October 2011.

Read also: Australian Lawyer questions legality of phosphate imports
Published: 10.10 - 2011 10:52Printer version    
ABC National Radio: The World Today story on Phosphate
10 October 2011
Reported by Samantha Donovan

Listen to MP3 of this story
Alternate wma version or mp3 download.

ELEANOR HALL: A lawyer advising the Australian Western Sahara Association is warning that Australian companies that continue to import phosphate rock from the disputed territory of Western Sahara may be liable for compensation.

Sydney barrister Tim Robertson SC is calling on three major Australian companies to stop their imports from the region.

He says they are breaching international law by buying the phosphate from a state-owned Moroccan company, which has no right to sell the resource, as Samantha Donovan explains.

SAMANTHA DONOVAN: Superphosphate fertilisers are crucial for Australian food production. To make the fertiliser three Australian companies use phosphate rock from Western Sahara - Incitec Pivot, Impact Fertilisers and CSBP, which is part of Wesfarmers.

Since the 1990s, they've been aware of claims by Western Sahara activists that Morocco doesn't have the right to sell the product to them.

The Fertiliser Industry Federation of Australia represents the companies and says they've all had legal advice that their buying of phosphate doesn't breach international law.

But Sydney barrister Tim Robertson SC disagrees.

His opinion was sought by the Australia Western Sahara Association which campaigns for the self-determination of the Indigenous population.

TIM ROBERTSON: The state that is in control of Western Sahara - Morocco - is an illegal occupying power and it has no title to the resources that it's selling to the Australian companies. So the Australian companies can't gain any better title than Morocco has and Morocco has none, so they're in a spot of bother.

SAMANTHA DONOVAN: Morocco fiercely disagrees that it is an illegal occupying power. It told an Australian Government hearing earlier this year that "no recognised international body has ever considered the exploitation of the natural resources by Morocco as acts of plundering detrimental to the inhabitants of the region".

Tim Robertson though believes the Australian phosphate importers could end up having to pay compensation.

TIM ROBERTSON: Someone could come along with a better right of title such as the government-in-exile for Western Sahara, which is recognised by a third of the countries in the world including most African countries, it might come along and say well these resources belong to the people of Western Sahara under international law as they do and as the General Assembly of the United Nations has declared on numerous occasions, therefore they belong to us and you're taking it.

SAMANTHA DONOVAN: Tim Robertson SC also believes the Australian fertiliser companies could be breaching the Customs Act.

TIM ROBERTSON: Many of them are stating on their import declarations that the goods are from Morocco. They're not and if they've put down on the manifest that they've supplied to customs that the country of origin is Morocco then they are breaching the Customs Act and that is a criminal offence.

SAMANTHA DONOVAN: Tim Robertson says that ultimately this type of dispute is only ever settled through international politics.

A spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade says that Australia recognises the UN classification of Western Sahara as a non-self-governing territory and the Government believes the people of Western Sahara have a right to self-determination.

She pointed out the UN hasn't imposed restrictions on the trade of phosphates and says DFAT recommends that companies do seek legal advice before importing it.

ELEANOR HALL: Samantha Donovan reporting.




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy