ECJ finds Swedish fisheries in Western Sahara illegal

The European Court of Justice has in an answer to a question from a Swedish court of appeal informed that private fisheries agreements with Moroccan authorities are not allowed outside of the context of the EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement.
Published: 12.10 - 2014 15:22Printer version    
Photo: In 2008, Greenpeace campaigned against the Swedish vessels carrying out illegal EU fisheries in occupied Western Sahara.

tn_greenpeacee_509.jpgThe ECJ on 9 October 2014 passed a ruling which is part of a many-year long legal process going on in Swedish courts.

The dispute has been whether it was legal or not for the fishermen to carry out fisheries activities in what the court process labeled "Moroccan fishing zone" at the same time as the EU had a Fisheries Partnership Agreement with Morocco. The entire EU fishing fleet is  supposed to be taking place through authorisations given by Brussels.

Two Swedish fishermen were in 2009 charged by the Swedish district court of Gothenburg with illegal fishing during a period April 2007 to May 2008.

Their two vessels, Nordic IV and Aldo, did not have the relevant permissions from the Swedish fisheries authorities and EU regulations according to the prosecutor who also stated that the fishing had generated large profits, approximately 20 million Swedish kronas (2.3 million euros).

After several years of postponement due partly to obstruction from the accused, the court process finally took place in October 2012.

The accused claimed that they had in fact not been responsible for the fisheries offshore Western Sahara themselves during this period, but that they had rented out their vessels through separate bareboat charter agreements to the Moroccan fishing company Atlas Pelagic in Dakhla. The defence claimed that the fishing permits therefore were not needed.

The district court of Gothenburg found the fishermen had carried out illegal fishing since they had indeed been responsible for the fishing and without the relevant permissions. However due to a formal mistake in the description of the alleged crime by the prosecutor, the two fishermen were found not guilty.  

The prosecutor appealed the verdict and in September 2013 the case appeared in the court of appeal in Gothenburg in Sweden.

This time the defence claimed that a specific paragraph in the 2006 EU-Moroccan Fisheries Partnership Agreement could be interpreted as signing private agreements with Moroccan companies for such fisheries to be legal.  

The court of appeal therefore decided to ask for a preliminary ruling ('förhandsbesked' in Swedish) from the European Court of Justice.

The answer from the European Court of Justice on 9 October is that "the Fisheries Agreement, in particular Article 6 thereof, must be interpreted as excluding any possibility for Community vessels to carry out fishing activities in Moroccan fishing zones on the basis of a licence issued by the Moroccan authorities without the intervention of the competent European Union authorities"

The Swedish fishermen supports the prosecutor's claim that the fisheries was done in an illegal manner. The date for the Swedish court of appeal to continue the legal process with a final verdict is not known.

WSRW and the Swedish magazine Västsahara has followed the process closely since it began.

It should be noted that it is of WSRW’s view that no fishing licence, as a matter of international law, could be given by Moroccan government for waters of Western Sahara at all. Morocco’s claim to sovereignty over Western Sahara are rejected by the international community and by the International Court of Justice. Yet, Morocco is still illegall occupying the western part of the Non-Self-Governing Territory. The ECJ is separately dealing with this question of the legality of EU fisheries in Western Sahara. Frente Polisario this year brought an action against the European Council in the ECJ for an annulment of the EU-Moroccan Fisheries Partnership Agreement.




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy