Below letter was sent from the government of Western Sahara to Oslo registered SeaBird Exploration on 4 December 2014, as a reponse to the discovery of vessels owned by the company, operating in the waters offshore the occupied territory. Read more about those activities here.
4 December 2014
Mr. DAG REYNOLDS Chief Executive Officer SeaBird Exploration Group Cort Adelers gate 16 0112 Oslo Norway
Seabed petroleum exploration on the coast of occupied Western Sahara
Dear Mr. Reynolds,
The Saharawi people and their government have the privilege to express their compliments to you. We regret this letter does not come under more auspicious circumstances. Our purpose in writing is to protest petroleum exploration currently being done by Seabird Exploration on the continental shelf of occupied Western Sahara, and to insist on an immediate end to the activity.
A Seabird Exploration Group vessel, the Harrier Explorer, began such exploratory work last week. A seismic survey of the continental shelf is being carried out approximately 25 nautical miles off the Atlantic coast of Western Sahara, at 27.35° N, 14.45° W and will apparently continue over a 20 day period until 2,000 kilometres of linear track data is acquired.
In this letter, we detail the reasons why such petroleum exploration must necessarily end.
The Saharawi people do not consent the development and export of their natural resources from the occupied part of their territory. We manifestly do not receive the benefit of such resources, the revenues from which go to sustain an occupation that has brought with it the illegal in-migration – a settlement contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949 – of Moroccan nationals.
The government of the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic (the SADR) has considered the present activity in the context of the continuing occupation of Western Sahara by Morocco. Exploration for petroleum in the territory is illegal because it violates our people’s right of sovereignty to their natural resources. The exercise of the right is an important part of our self-determination. We are also concerned that the present seismic surveys will involve the use of so-called air guns, which may be damaging to the important coastal fishery of an area squarely in the Canary Current Large Marine Ecosystem, Africa’s most productive fishery. We know of no environmental impact assessment prepared for the present exploration activity.
Western Sahara, formerly Spanish Sahara, is often referred to as Africa’s last colony. Spain abandoned the territory in late 1975 to Mauritania and Morocco. On 27 February 1976 the Saharawi people’s representatives declared the SADR to be independent, a state recognized by more than 80 others, and a member of the African Union. In 1979 when the SADR and Mauritania concluded a peace treaty, Morocco then took more of Western Sahara, about three-quarters of the territory.
Morocco’s occupation of Western Sahara was illegitimate from the start, violating the United Nations Charter and the law of self-determination for colonized (non-self-governing) peoples, together with the law prohibiting aggression now found in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The cases of East Timor, Namibia and Kuwait demonstrate this illegality. The United Nations General Assembly has declared the occupation to be one as such. No state recognizes Morocco’s claim to Western Sahara.
Those who explore for natural resources in occupied Western Sahara sometimes suggest that the territory is “disputed”. However, our territory is not in dispute. It is illegally occupied by the presence of more than 100,000 Moroccan soldiers. The International Court of Justice in its 1975 Western Sahara advisory opinion rejected Morocco’s claim to the territory:
[T]he Court's conclusion is that the materials and information presented to it do not establish any tie of territorial sovereignty between the territory of Western Sahara and the Kingdom of Morocco or the Mauritanian entity. Thus the Court has not found legal ties of such a nature as might affect the application of resolution 1514 (XV) in the decolonization of Western Sahara and, in particular, of the principle of self-determination through the free and genuine expression of the will of the peoples of the Territory. [Paragraph 162.]
Morocco’s occupation of Western Sahara is notorious for its brutality and absence of third party human rights monitoring, with proven violations of the leading international human rights and humanitarian law treaties. The Saharawi people in refugee camps in Algeria receive no benefit from the trade in natural resources in the occupied territory and are dependent on aid to survive in one of the most inhospitable settings on earth. In May 2012 such problems were highlighted to the UN Human Rights Council during its “Universal Periodic Review” of Morocco’s human rights performance.
The illegal occupation of Western Sahara is legitimized by individuals and corporations who deal with Morocco for the territory’s resources. The conflict over Western Sahara is prolonged, and the Saharawi people denied their economic future, by exploration and development of our natural resources.
The government of the SADR is grateful for your consideration of this matter and is confident Seabird Exploration will accept that it should not be engaged in any aspect of seabed petroleum exploration on the coast of Western Sahara.
We would be grateful if circulate the text of the present letter to the members of the Board and also to your shareholders.
Dr. Ghali Zbeir Chair, Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic Petroleum and Mines Authority
c: Åge Korsvold Chairman Board of Directors, SeaBird Exploration.
c: Christopher Ross, Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations for Western Sahara.
c: Kim Bolduc, United Nations Special Representative for Western Sahara and Head of MINURSO
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.