Agrium’s reply to WSRW, 19 February 2016
Published: 22.02 - 2016 13:13Printer version    
Agrium Inc.’s letter of reply of 19 February 2016, to WSRW’s inquiry of 26 January 2016, included below.

26 January 2016

Agrium Inc.
13131 Lake Fraser Drive S.E.
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E8

To the attention of Richard Downey
Vice President, Investor/Corporate Relations and Market Research

Dear Mr Downey,

Request for comments -
Report on Agrium’s phosphate imports from occupied Western Sahara

Western Sahara Resource Watch (WSRW) is again privileged to write to you. This letter is about Agrium Inc’s phosphate imports into Canada from occupied Western Sahara in 2015.

In the coming weeks, WSRW will publish its annual “P for Plunder” report, documenting the phosphate trade from Western Sahara in the previous calendar year. As one of the leading importers, Agrium Inc will be featured in the report.
Our research shows that Agrium has received 8 shipments of phosphate rock mined at Bou Craa, Western Sahara, in 2015. Our calculations put the total volume of those shipments at about 437,000 tonnes. Though still substantial, it is a decrease from the company’s import of 2014, estimated at 779,000 tonnes.

In our previous letters, we have outlined our concerns with regard to the detrimental effects of Agrium’s imports on the Western Sahara peace process, and on the Saharawi people’s well established and universally recognized right to self-determination. We will not repeat them here.

However, there are some recent, notable developments that ought to be addressed. You will have seen the Concluding Recommendations in the review of Morocco by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), published in October 2015. The UN treaty body was very clear on the significance of the Saharawi people’s right to self-determination, also with regard to Western Sahara’s natural resources. The Committee recommended Morocco to “guarantee respect for the principle of prior, free and informed consent of the Sahraouis, and thus that they are able to exercise their right to enjoy and utilize fully and freely their natural wealth and resources”.  In the present circumstances, we know that this does not happen.

The Legal Opinion published by the African Union on 14 October 2015 takes the matter even further by avowedly referring to Morocco as “the occupying power” in Western Sahara. “Only the people of Western Sahara have the right to permanent sovereignty over their natural resources”, the Opinion continues. The African Union called on companies to adhere to international obligations and refrain from business deals with Morocco pertaining to Western Sahara, as that leads to “perpetuation or legitimation of the colonial situation in Western Sahara”.  
On 10 December 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled the EU-Morocco Free Trade Agreement as it applies in Western Sahara. In its judgment, the Court states that Morocco has no mandate by the United Nations or by any other institution for the administration of the territory.

In the fall of 2015, an upsurge in socio-economic protests was observed in occupied Western Sahara. What started out as regular demonstrations by unemployed Saharawi graduates in El Aaiun, has – particularly in recent weeks – spread to other parts of the Saharawi demographic and to other towns in the occupied territory. Saharawis protest against what they refer to as “Morocco’s policy of marginalizing Saharawis”. They no longer accept being treated as second class citizens, while Moroccan settlers receive employment on the back of Morocco’s illegal exploitation of the Saharawis’ homeland. Grievances are in particular targeted against your supplier of phosphate rock, Office Chérifien des Phosphates SA (OCP). Demonstrations are taking place daily, and are being met with disproportionate use of force by the Moroccan police. A group of 19 Saharawis is currently on hunger strike to demand their right to employment and a decent living. On 22 January 2016, a group of Saharawis entered the headquarters of OCP in Casablanca, in Morocco proper, to demand their share of their land’s phosphates. As a side note, protests against OCP are also taking place throughout Morocco proper, especially with regard to the poor working conditions and health and safety concerns for phosphate workers.  

In view of the above, we would be most grateful if, preferably before this February 20, Agrium could clarify the following issues;

1. Is it correct that Agrium received eight shipments of phosphate rock from Western Sahara during 2015, amounting to approximately 437,000 tonnes?
2. What would explain the firm’s lesser need for/dependence on Saharawi phosphate in 2015, in comparison to 2014?
3. Would Agrium agree that the people of Western Sahara have a right to self-determination as defined by international law and the 1990-91 referendum agreement of the UN, Morocco and the Frente Polisario?
4. Would Agrium agree with the conclusion of the International Court of Justice that there are no ties to sovereignty between the kingdom of Morocco and the territory of Western Sahara?
5. Does Agrium accept the 2015 conclusion of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) about the principle of the prior, free and informed consent of the Saharawis in relation to the exploitation of Western Sahara’s natural resources? How will the company assure itself of a credible consent prior to importing from Western Sahara?
6. Does Agrium accept the conclusion of the Court of Justice of the European Union that Morocco has no mandate to administer Western Sahara?
7. What does Agrium say in reply to the legal opinion of the African Union about the exploitation of occupied Western Sahara’s natural resources?

WSRW remains of the view that Agrium must not purchase phosphate rock from Western Sahara while the final status of the territory is pending. By ending all engagement in occupied Western Sahara, Agrium can significantly contribute to the good faith needed to reach a just and lasting outcome of the UN peace talks. In the long run, this will benefit the entire Maghreb region.

We remain at your disposal should you have any questions. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sara Eyckmans
Western Sahara Resource Watch




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy