Here is the newly proposed EU-Morocco fisheries agreement
The text of the new EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement - which includes Western Sahara in its geographic scope but has been negotiated exclusively between the EU and Morocco - has now been presented to the European Parliament for approval.
Find the proposed "Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco, the Implementation Protocol thereto and an exchange of letters accompanying the said Agreement" here. The Commission transmitted the text to the European Parliament a week ago, seeking its green light.
A first reading indicates that the EU has agreed to pay more EU taxpayers' money to Morocco in return for more fish from Western Sahara - not Morocco. The higher quotas offered by Morocco apply to the small pelagic stocks, which are fished exclusively in the waters of occupied Western Sahara. Instead of the 80 million that Rabat had requested, the EU agreed to pay an annual 52 million for fishing privileges. That amount is still higher than the 40 million accorded under the previous deal which expired on July 14.
"We call upon European Parliamentarians to uphold EU law, and vote against a proposal that so clearly violates a ruling of the highest Court of the EU. In doing so, they would act in the interest of the people of Western Sahara - who oppose the agreement - and the interests of EU citizens, whose taxes should not be used to pay Morocco for access to fish stocks of another nation", says Sara Eyckmans of Western Sahara Resource Watch.
In the European Parliament, the Fisheries Committee will first study the proposal, and then issue a recommendation to the plenary session whether or not to vote in favour of it. In Council, things might proceed more rapidly, as the Commission's department for maritime fisheries, DG MARE, has kept EU Member States updated on the progress of its negotiations with Morocco.
The European Commission and Morocco have initialed the Agreement and Protocol in Rabat last week. In order to become operative, the text requires consent of Morocco's legislative bodies, and those of the EU: the Member States and the EU Parliament. In spite of the EU Court of Justice stipulating that the consent of the people of Western Sahara is necessary in order for any EU-Morocco bilateral agreement to affect the territory, the EU has chosen to blatantly ignore that legal requirement.
Since you're here.... WSRWs work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters and we hope you do too. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work 3, 5, 27 what you can spare the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.