The Norwegian vessel that turned 180 degrees upon arriving South African waters with fish from occupied Western Sahara, has spent the last two days discharging its cargo in the port of Abidjan. An international request for detaining the vessel was sent out to African states.
Above: Green Glacier arrived at the port of Abidjan two weeks after leaving the neighbouring port of Tema. Illustration: Marinetraffic.com
Western Sahara Resource Watch (WSRW) knows that the government of South Africa sent out a request to neighbouring governments to detain the vessel Green Glacier, if it were to enter their waters.
The request was sent out on 25 January. The vessel contained a controversial cargo, consisting of fish illegally caught by Russian trawlers in the waters of occupied Western Sahara. WSRW has followed the route of the vessel since it picked up the cargo during the New Year week.
On 23 January, as the vessel was about to arrive at its final destination of Cape Town, WSRW asked the local harbour authorities to intervene. WSRW has indications that the government of South Africa was ready to do so.
However, after waiting for a few hours on the doorstep to South African marine jurisdiction, the shipping company Green Reefers ordered its vessel to make a u-turn, sending its ship steaming full speed back north to Abidjan, the same area it had departed one week earlier.
It is still not known to WSRW what finally triggered the Green Reefers vessel to abort its mission at last minute. The affair had received attention from local media in South Africa.
Green Glacier arrived at Abidjan on the 1st of February, 15 days after it had left a port in the neighbouring country of Ghana, located only a few hours' voyage away.
The legal risk for companies to be involved in the illegal plunder of Western Sahara has increased dramatically following the decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU in 2016-2018. The court stated that deals covering Western Sahara can only apply if they have obtained the consent of the Saharawi people. This decision was reflected in the South African detention of the cargo onboard of the vessel NM Cherry Blossom, a bulk ship that was stuck in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, for 370 days.
Since you're here.... WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.