WSRW's letter to Atlas Copco, 17 March 2017
Published: 18.03 - 2019 11:14Printer version    
Atlas Copco AB
SE-105 23 Stockholm, Sweden

Att: Mr. Mats Rahmström
President and Chief Executive Officer

17 March 2019, Brussels

Request for comments and clarifications
Regarding Atlas Copco’s role in phosphate production in occupied Western Sahara

To Mr. Rahmström

WSRW refers to a letter we sent to you on 27 March 2017 regarding your company’s supplies to the Bou Craa mine in occupied Western Sahara. Our association had questions regarding your deliveries to the mine, as well as your understanding of applicable international law and your future plans. That letter also summarises the correspondence that we had had until then. The letter can be found here:

On 10 April 2017, Atlas Copco responded that the company "has enhanced efforts to detect and ensure that no future indirect or direct sales in these regions go to projects that may violate international law. Atlas Copco always complies fully with all trade laws, regulations and sanctions. There is no new information that we can share about the concerned business or the customer."

None of our questions were answered.

On 14 April 2017, WSRW wrote to Atlas Copco that “We regret to observe that AtlasCopco does not wish to elaborate more on the business nor on the customer. We will note this in our reports. Does that mean we can expect receiving answers to the other questions we have asked - regarding international law, your website and regarding what has been done since 2013?”.

On 5 June 2017, your company responded that “We believe that we have already shared the relevant information in regards to your questions”.

On 21 June 2017, WSRW wrote that “We do notice that Atlas Copco amended parts of the article on Western Sahara on your website following our correspondence. We are glad to see that Atlas Copco has made corrections to errors on the website, just as it did in 2013, after our correspondence at the time. Please notice that the references to the United Nations on your website are still misleading.

Those references are liked to the issues of international law that we have not received answers to. WSRW also asked two further questions. We received no answer to that latest mail.

Based on this correspondence, it is not today possible for us – nor for the Saharawi people who owns the resources which Morocco is illegally exploiting with the help of Atlas Copco equipment – to know how you assess these matters.

We find Atlas Copco’s unwillingness to engage on the matter as regrettable. WSRW is publishing a new report on the role of international companies in Morocco’s plunder of Western Sahara’s phosphate rock in April 2019. In view of that, we would appreciate, again, an answer to the questions we asked on 27 March 2017.

In addition, we would like an answer to the following questions:

1) In 2013, your company published an article on your website called “Business near occupied and Non-Self Governing territories” on this URL:
The article outlined your position on occupied lands. The wording on that article was in 2017 changed into this:
Today, this article is no longer to be found on your website. Why is that?

2) On your website, under the article “Histoire Atlas Copco au Maroc”, your company explains that a delivery was made to “Phosboucraa”. The article can be found here: - or downloaded via this link:
Why does Atlas Copco present the Phosboucraa as located in Morocco?

3) In the document “Timeline Booklet for Morocco”, seemingly published on your website in 2013, the territory of Western Sahara is presented on a map as part of Morocco.
The document can also be viewed here.
Does Atlas Copco consider Western Sahara to be part of Morocco?

As our report is out in April, we appreciate an answer before our internal deadline, 22 March 2019.
Looking forward to hearing from you,

Erik Hagen
Board member,
Western Sahara Resource Watch




Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2019 News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy