Thank you for your letter dated 14 March about our import of phosphate rock from the non self governing territory of Western Sahara.
From the arrival at the ports through to the handling and processing at our three manufacturing plants, the quality of phosphate rock determines the environmental impacts and is a key driver in limiting options. Our determination to apply the processed rock in an environmentally considerate way so that the right nutrients go in the right place also is a constraint on our rock blends and selection.
We are not immune to your concerns and have been devoting substantial time and effort into researching additional sources of phosphate rock. But when it comes to NZ manufacture and application, there is currently no alternative that comes without significant environmental impacts, processing costs and miscellaneous supply risks.
As you know, the UN’s framework of managing resources in territories like these is that:
1. The operations should promote economic advancement and provide direct and indirect benefits to the inhabitants of the territory and to the territory itself 2. Working conditions should be non-discriminatory 3. The operations should be conducted rationally and sustainably to ensure long-term access to resources. As a co-operative on the other side of the world, it’s not our role to try and sift through any claims and counter claims between rival parties locked in a complex geopolitical dispute. Our relationship is with a commercial company and we carry out our due diligence on that supplier based on the UN framework and our own code of conduct and commercial position.
It remains our position that we are trading legally but understand the moral and ethical debate hence our focus on seeking alternatives and additional sources.
I realise that this will probably not satisfy WSRW’s wishes, but wanted to reply to you to let you know that we are taking the issue seriously and doing what we can. Any developments are likely to take time and meanwhile we support the UN process for a lasting and meaningful settlement to this dispute.
If I can help with any further questions, please let me know.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.