The Irish oil company San Leon Energy is operating in Western Sahara in violation of international law, and the opinion of the legal departement of the UN. According to the UN, the Irish government and the rest of the international community, no oil research in Western Sahara can take place without consulting with the people of the territory.
This was the first time San Leon has given statements on the matter. WSRW sent a letter to the firm on 21 July, and awaits reply. San Leon has received numerous requests on the matter over the last years, from both concerned Irish and Saharawi people, but has never replied.
The reason why the firm does not want to take into account the wishes of the people of the territory, is that the Saharawis “would not speak to us”, since the people “very much take side”. The point is interesting, taking into account that the Saharawis have sent numerous letters to San Leon, none of which have been answered by the firm.
The statements were given by Daniel Martin, a London based lawyer of San Leon. Representatives of Moroccan government declined to take part in the programme.
See the full transcript of the surprising San Leon interview below.
[San Leon:] We knew that there was a dispute. And we knew that there were problems in the area. We take international obligations seriously. [RTE:] In order to be legal, any extraction of natural resources must benefit local people. But they don’t see any. They’ve been protesting against San Leon and some people even went on hunger strike to highlight the injustice. [San Leon:] I am not aware of that. Any time we receive information like that we do genuinely pass it on the Moroccans. [RTE:] Do you have any line of communication to the Saharawi people? [San Leon:] We don’t, no we don’t. [RTE:] Why not? [San Leon:] Because they’re not…from our point of view, and certainly from the point of view of the organisation and the government that issues our licence, they are not a representative people. [RTE:] Why not consult with them directly, say “are you benefiting”? [San Leon:] I don’t think they would actually speak to us, to be honest, that’s just kind of the way that things go, in this dispute [RTE:] Why? [San Leon:] People very much takes side, I’m afraid. [RTE:] From what I can tell from you is, you are making hundreds of millions and you some time in the future they might benefit, it is not very clear is it? [San Leon:] With all due respect, there’s nothing about this situation that is very clear. There’s absolutely nothing about this situation that is very clear. What we’re doing now…think about it this way...we’re not generating income. It’s not like we’re got a money making machine in the desert. What we’re doing right now is relaying the scientific groundwork.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.