SA Court confirms: Morocco has no ownership over Saharawi phoshates

The High Court of South Africa today confirmed that the owner of the cargo of phosphate rock aboard the detained vessel, NM Cherry Blossom, is the Saharawi Government, and not Morocco's state-owned phosphate company which was not entitled to sell the commodity. Major victory for the Saharawis in an African Court.
Printer version    
On 1 May 2017, the bulk carrier NM Cherry Blossom was detained at Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Aboard the vessel was 55,000 tonnes of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara, sold by the Moroccan state-owned phosphate company OCP (and subsidiary Phosboucraa) to a New Zealand based farmers' cooperative; Ballance Agri-Nutrients. The exiled Government of the Saharawi Republic in combination with the Saharawi people's organisation Polisario had obtained the court order for the detention of the cargo.

After several steps in the legal process, the South African High Court 23 February 2018 declared that:
1. The Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic is the owner of the whole cargo of phosphate presently laden on the motor vessel "NM Cherry Blossom"; and
2. Ownership in the phosphate has never lawfully vested in OCP SA or Phosphates de Boucraa SA, and they were, and are, not entitled to sell the phosphate to Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited.

Download the complete, official ruling here.

"This is very good news for the people of Western Sahara. The judgment is perfectly in line with the Court of Justice of the EU and the legal opinion of the African Union", Mhamed Khadad, Polisario coordinator to the UN operation MINURSO told Western Sahara Resource Watch.

"We hope that all those companies who participate in the plunder of the resources of Western Sahara will understand the legal risk. Polisario will use all legal tools to put an end to the plunder of the Saharawi people's resources. In the meantime, we are very open to build good relations with all those who are interested in our resources. The exploitation of Western Sahara's resources require consent of the representatives of the people of the territory", Khadad stated.

See press release from Polisario the organisation that initiated the court case, dated 23 February 2018 here.

The news was also welcomed by EU representatives, who highlight the significance of the South African ruling on the eve of yet another Western Sahara judgment by the EU Court of Justice, expected next Tuesday. "I welcome this new legal victory for the people of Western Sahara, this time thanks to the High Court in South Africa. This is yet another dressing-down for the European Commission, which persists to ignore the international right of the Saharawis over their natural resources, by negotiating a trade deal with Morocco without the consent of the Saharawi people. I urge the EU officials in Brussels to wake up to the hard reality of democratic societies: the rule of law matters", said EU Parliamentarian Florent Marcellesi of the Greens/EFA group.

The NM Cherry Blossom had stopped over in South Africa for provisioning. It was during those few hours that the Saharawi authorities managed to successfully obtain the detention of the cargo. In June, the South African High Court declared the detention to be lawful, and that a trial to determine the ownership of the cargo was to take place. Two months later, in July 2017, OCP decided to drop its defence in the legal proceedings.

To date, the NM Cherry Blossom is at anchor in Port Elizabeth, coming at a high financial cost for the owners and operators of the vessel. In June 2017, WSRW contacted all operating firms that had been responsible for the shipment of Western Sahara phosphate in 2016. Read our report 'Carriers of Conflict' on the shipping companies behind the controversial trade.

The New Zealand importer had never asked the Saharawi people for permission to import from the occupied territory. Several international and national courts, as well as the UN, is clear that the people of Western Sahara need to give its consent. The importer from New Zealand is said to have been present during the court decision today.

Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.


06.03 - 2018 / 06.03 - 2018Kosmos Energy maintains propaganda site after Western Sahara exit
02.03 - 2018 / 01.03 - 2018What is HeidelbergCement doing in occupied Western Sahara?
01.03 - 2018 / 01.03 - 2018Confirmed: Innophos key client of Western Sahara phosphate rock
28.02 - 2018 / 28.02 - 2018South Africa stands up against the plunder of Western Sahara
28.02 - 2018 / 28.02 - 2018Bermuda shipping company drops Western Sahara
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018EU and Morocco announce continued fisheries partnership
27.02 - 2018 / 23.02 - 2018EU Parliament slams Commission on Western Sahara talks
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018Polisario: open to negotiate Western Sahara deals with the EU
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018Saharawi refugees celebrate EU Court victory
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018BREAKING: EU Court stops EU-Morocco fish deal in Western Sahara
23.02 - 2018 / 23.02 - 2018SA Court confirms: Morocco has no ownership over Saharawi phoshates
23.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018EU Member States disagree over toxic fertilizers
21.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018Vigeo Eiris goes back on false claim
20.02 - 2018 / 20.02 - 2018EU Parliamentarians concerned over Commission's respect of rule of law
15.02 - 2018 / 15.02 - 2018Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
08.02 - 2018 / 08.02 - 2018Studies continue on Kosmos Energy's block
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Kosmos and Cairn have pulled out of Western Sahara
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Why WSRW refuses to take part in the EU's Western Sahara consultation
03.02 - 2018 / 03.02 - 2018Unison condemnation of the EU Commission from Western Sahara groups
02.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018Siemens fails to respond Western Sahara question at AGM


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy