PotashCorp shareholders request human rights review in Western Sahara
Two institutional shareholders of PotashCorp are presenting a proposal before next week's annual meeting of the company. PotashCorp is the world's largest importer of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara.
Shareholders to present human rights proposal at Potash Corporation general meeting
Press release, May 5, 2016
Two institutional shareholders of Potash Corporation (TSX:POT) will present a shareholder proposal at the company’s annual meeting Tuesday May 10th, asking the company to commission and make public an independent assessment of its human rights responsibilities in relation to sourcing phosphate rock from Western Sahara.
Potash Corporation is now the world’s largest importer of phosphate rock from the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara, part of which is currently controlled by Morocco. Morocco’s claim of sovereignty over the Western Sahara is not recognized by the International Court of Justice or the United Nations, and serious human rights violations have been reported in the territory. It is sometimes called “Africa’s last colony”.
The Congregation of the Sisters of Mercy of Newfoundland and OceanRock Investments Inc. (Meritas Jantzi Social Index® Fund) worked with the Shareholder Association for Research and Education (SHARE) to file the proposal. This is the second year shareholders have filed this resolution at the company.
“Since 2015 the legal and reputational risks related to extraction of resources from Western Sahara have steadily grown,” said Fred Pinto, CEO of OceanRock Investments Inc. “Conducting an assessment of the company’s actual and potential impacts is a long-overdue first step in human rights due diligence. As the international community’s attention is increasingly drawn to the conflict, this assessment is even more critical for shareholders.”
The company’s Board recommends a vote against the proposal, saying that “a distinction must be made between political issues and the legal and other responsibilities placed on companies operating in the region or having business relations with companies operating in the region.”
“There is a difference between a political approach – which Potash is not being asked to take – and a business approach, which any public company working in the Western Sahara is obliged to take,” said Sister Sheila O’Dea of the Congregation of the Sisters of Mercy of Newfoundland. “The question is not ‘how can Potash fix the situation in the Western Sahara?’ but ‘what are the actual and potential human rights impacts of Potash’s business operations on the Sahrawi people?’”
“Potash says it has done its due diligence, but no reports by independent parties have been made publicly available,” said Kevin Thomas, Director of Shareholder Engagement for SHARE. “The company has indicated that it is relying on two undisclosed reports prepared for the Moroccan state-owned company from which Potash purchases phosphate rock, as well as on visits by company officials. That’s neither independent nor transparent.”
The company’s Annual Meeting will be held in Saskatoon at 3:30pm local time on May 10.
For more information or to arrange interviews, please contact:
Kevin Thomas Director, Shareholder Engagement Shareholder Association for Research & Education Email: email@example.com Phone: 416-992-5392
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.